Treatment Differences in Primary and Specialty Settings in Veterans with Major Depression.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Leung, Lucinda B
Bossarte, Robert M
Keusch, Janelle N
Ziobrowski, Hannah N
Pigeon, Wilfred R
Oslin, David W
Post, Edward P
Kessler, Ronald C
Integrated Health Care Systems
Mental Health Services
Primary Health Care
Journal titleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
Publication Begin page268
Publication End page290
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) supports the nation's largest primary care-mental health integration (PC-MHI) collaborative care model to increase treatment of mild to moderate common mental disorders in primary care (PC) and refer more severe-complex cases to specialty mental health (SMH) settings. It is unclear how this treatment assignment works in practice.
Patients (n = 2610) who sought incident episode VHA treatment for depression completed a baseline self-report questionnaire about depression severity-complexity. Administrative data were used to determine settings and types of treatment during the next 30 days.
Thirty-four percent (34.2%) of depressed patients received treatment in PC settings, 65.8% in SMH settings. PC patients had less severe and fewer comorbid depressive episodes. Patients with lowest severity and/or complexity were most likely to receive PC antidepressant medication treatment; those with highest severity and/or complexity were most likely to receive combined treatment in SMH settings. Assignment of patients across settings and types of treatment was stronger than found in previous civilian studies but less pronounced than expected (cross-validated AUC = 0.50-0.68).
By expanding access to evidence-based treatments, VHA's PC-MHI increases consistency of treatment assignment. Reasons for assignment being less pronounced than expected and implications for treatment response will require continued study.
CitationPuac-Polanco V, Leung LB, Bossarte RM, Bryant C, Keusch JN, Liu H, Ziobrowski HN, Pigeon WR, Oslin DW, Post EP, Kessler RC. Treatment Differences in Primary and Specialty Settings in Veterans with Major Depression. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;34(2):268-290. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200475. PMID: 33832996; PMCID: PMC8439361.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Copyright 2021 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
- High Quality of Care Persists With Shifting Depression Services From VA Specialty to Integrated Primary Care.
- Authors: Leung LB, Escarce JJ, Yoon J, Sugar CA, Wells KB, Young AS, Rubenstein LV
- Issue date: 2019 Aug
- Implementation of primary care-mental health integration services in the Veterans Health Administration: program activity and associations with engagement in specialty mental health services.
- Authors: Wray LO, Szymanski BR, Kearney LK, McCarthy JF
- Issue date: 2012 Mar
- Changing Patterns of Mental Health Care Use: The Role of Integrated Mental Health Services in Veteran Affairs Primary Care.
- Authors: Leung LB, Yoon J, Rubenstein LV, Post EP, Metzger ME, Wells KB, Sugar CA, Escarce JJ
- Issue date: 2018 Jan-Feb
- Integrated care: treatment initiation following positive depression screens.
- Authors: Szymanski BR, Bohnert KM, Zivin K, McCarthy JF
- Issue date: 2013 Mar
- Effects of Virtual Care and Same-Day Access to Integrated Care on Specialty Mental Health Engagement in the Veterans Health Administration.
- Authors: Haderlein TP, Dobalian A, Raja PV, Der-Martirosian C
- Issue date: 2023 Jan-Dec