Treatment Differences in Primary and Specialty Settings in Veterans with Major Depression.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Puac-Polanco, VictorLeung, Lucinda B
Bossarte, Robert M
Bryant, Corey
Keusch, Janelle N
Liu, Howard
Ziobrowski, Hannah N
Pigeon, Wilfred R
Oslin, David W
Post, Edward P
Kessler, Ronald C
Keyword
ComorbidityDepression
Integrated Health Care Systems
Mental Health Services
Military Medicine
Primary Health Care
Psychotherapy
Self-Report
Veterans Health
Journal title
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMPublication Volume
34Publication Issue
2Publication Begin page
268Publication End page
290
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) supports the nation's largest primary care-mental health integration (PC-MHI) collaborative care model to increase treatment of mild to moderate common mental disorders in primary care (PC) and refer more severe-complex cases to specialty mental health (SMH) settings. It is unclear how this treatment assignment works in practice.Patients (n = 2610) who sought incident episode VHA treatment for depression completed a baseline self-report questionnaire about depression severity-complexity. Administrative data were used to determine settings and types of treatment during the next 30 days.
Thirty-four percent (34.2%) of depressed patients received treatment in PC settings, 65.8% in SMH settings. PC patients had less severe and fewer comorbid depressive episodes. Patients with lowest severity and/or complexity were most likely to receive PC antidepressant medication treatment; those with highest severity and/or complexity were most likely to receive combined treatment in SMH settings. Assignment of patients across settings and types of treatment was stronger than found in previous civilian studies but less pronounced than expected (cross-validated AUC = 0.50-0.68).
By expanding access to evidence-based treatments, VHA's PC-MHI increases consistency of treatment assignment. Reasons for assignment being less pronounced than expected and implications for treatment response will require continued study.
Citation
Puac-Polanco V, Leung LB, Bossarte RM, Bryant C, Keusch JN, Liu H, Ziobrowski HN, Pigeon WR, Oslin DW, Post EP, Kessler RC. Treatment Differences in Primary and Specialty Settings in Veterans with Major Depression. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;34(2):268-290. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200475. PMID: 33832996; PMCID: PMC8439361.DOI
10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200475ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3122/jabfm.2021.02.200475
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Copyright 2021 by the American Board of Family Medicine.