Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Farberg, Aaron SMarson, Justin W
Glazer, Alex
Litchman, Graham H
Svoboda, Ryan
Winkelmann, Richard R
Brownstone, Nicholas
Rigel, Darrell S
Keyword
American joint committee on cancer 8th editionConsensus
Cutaneous melanoma
Gene-expression profile
Prediction
Prognostic staging
Risk
Sentinel lymph node
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Journal title
Dermatology and therapyDate Published
2022-03-30Publication Volume
12Publication Issue
4Publication Begin page
807Publication End page
823
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Prognostic assessment of cutaneous melanoma relies on historical, clinicopathological, and phenotypic risk factors according to American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines but may not account for a patient's individual additional genetic risk factors.To review the available literature regarding commercially available gene expression profile (GEP) tests and their use in the management of cutaneous melanoma.
A literature search was conducted for original, English-language studies or meta-analyses published between 2010 and 2021 on commercially available GEP tests in cutaneous melanoma prognosis, clinical decision-making regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy, and real-world efficacy. After the literature review, the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group, an expert panel of dermatologists with specialized training in melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer diagnosis and management, utilized a modified Delphi technique to develop consensus statements regarding prognostic gene expression profile tests. Statements were only adopted with a supermajority vote of > 80%.
The initial search identified 1064 studies/meta-analyses that met the search criteria. Of these, we included 21 original articles and meta-analyses that studied the 31-GEP test (DecisionDx-Melanoma; Castle Biosciences, Inc.), five original articles that studied the 11-GEP test (Melagenix; NeraCare GmbH), and four original articles that studied the 8-GEP test with clinicopathological factors (Merlin; 8-GEP + CP; SkylineDx B.V.) in this review. Six statements received supermajority approval and were adopted by the panel.
GEP tests provide additional, reproducible information for dermatologists to consider within the larger framework of the eighth edition of the AJCC and NCCN cutaneous melanoma guidelines when counseling regarding prognosis and when considering a sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Citation
Farberg AS, Marson JW, Glazer A, Litchman GH, Svoboda R, Winkelmann RR, Brownstone N, Rigel DS; Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group. Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Apr;12(4):807-823. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00709-x. Epub 2022 Mar 30. PMID: 35353350; PMCID: PMC9021351.DOI
10.1007/s13555-022-00709-xae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s13555-022-00709-x
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons