Patient teenagers? A comparison of the sexual behavior of virginity pledgers and matched nonpledgers.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorRosenbaum, Janet Elise
Publication Begin pagee110
Publication End page20
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractThe US government spends more than $200 million annually on abstinence-promotion programs, including virginity pledges. This study compares the sexual activity of adolescent virginity pledgers with matched nonpledgers by using more robust methods than past research.
The subjects for this study were National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health respondents, a nationally representative sample of middle and high school students who, when surveyed in 1995, had never had sex or taken a virginity pledge and who were >15 years of age (n = 3440). Adolescents who reported taking a virginity pledge on the 1996 survey (n = 289) were matched with nonpledgers (n = 645) by using exact and nearest-neighbor matching within propensity score calipers on factors including prepledge religiosity and attitudes toward sex and birth control. Pledgers and matched nonpledgers were compared 5 years after the pledge on self-reported sexual behaviors and positive test results for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis, and safe sex outside of marriage by use of birth control and condoms in the past year and at last sex.
Five years after the pledge, 82% of pledgers denied having ever pledged. Pledgers and matched nonpledgers did not differ in premarital sex, sexually transmitted diseases, and anal and oral sex variables. Pledgers had 0.1 fewer past-year partners but did not differ in lifetime sexual partners and age of first sex. Fewer pledgers than matched nonpledgers used birth control and condoms in the past year and birth control at last sex.
The sexual behavior of virginity pledgers does not differ from that of closely matched nonpledgers, and pledgers are less likely to protect themselves from pregnancy and disease before marriage. Virginity pledges may not affect sexual behavior but may decrease the likelihood of taking precautions during sex. Clinicians should provide birth control information to all adolescents, especially virginity pledgers.
CitationRosenbaum JE. Patient teenagers? A comparison of the sexual behavior of virginity pledgers and matched nonpledgers. Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):e110-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0407. PMID: 19117832; PMCID: PMC2768056.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
- Virginity pledges among the willing: delays in first intercourse and consistency of condom use.
- Authors: Martino SC, Elliott MN, Collins RL, Kanouse DE, Berry SH
- Issue date: 2008 Oct
- Reborn a virgin: adolescents' retracting of virginity pledges and sexual histories.
- Authors: Rosenbaum JE
- Issue date: 2006 Jun
- After the promise: the STD consequences of adolescent virginity pledges.
- Authors: Brückner H, Bearman P
- Issue date: 2005 Apr
- Going most of the way: "technical virginity" among American adolescents.
- Authors: Uecker JE, Angotti N, Regnerus MD
- Issue date: 2008 Dec
- Examining the prospective effects of making a virginity pledge among males across their 4 years of college.
- Authors: Williams S, Thompson MP
- Issue date: 2013