Lupus community panel proposals for optimising clinical trials: 2018.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Merrill, Joan TManzi, Susan
Aranow, Cynthia
Askanase, Anca
Bruce, Ian
Chakravarty, Eliza
Chong, Ben
Costenbader, Karen
Dall'Era, Maria
Ginzler, Ellen
Hanrahan, Leslie
Kalunian, Ken
Merola, Joseph
Raymond, Sandra
Rovin, Brad
Saxena, Amit
Werth, Victoria P
Journal title
Lupus science & medicineDate Published
2018-03-23Publication Volume
5Publication Issue
1Publication Begin page
e000258
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Formidable impediments stand in the way of treatment development for lupus. These include the unwieldy size of current trials, international competition for scarce patients, complex outcome measures and a poor understanding of these outcomes in the world at large. The heterogeneity of the disease itself coupled to superimposition of variegated background polypharmacy has created enough immunological noise to virtually ensure the failure of lupus treatment trials, leaving an understandable suspicion that at least some of the results in testing failed drugs over the years may not have been negative, but merely uninterpretable. The authors have consulted with many clinical trial investigators, biopharmaceutical developers and stakeholders from government and voluntary sectors. This paper examines the available evidence that supports workable trial designs and proposes approaches to improve the odds of completing interpretable treatment development programs for lupus.Citation
Merrill JT, Manzi S, Aranow C, Askanase A, Bruce I, Chakravarty E, Chong B, Costenbader K, Dall'Era M, Ginzler E, Hanrahan L, Kalunian K, Merola J, Raymond S, Rovin B, Saxena A, Werth VP. Lupus community panel proposals for optimising clinical trials: 2018. Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Mar 23;5(1):e000258. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000258. Erratum in: Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Jun 11;5(1):e000258corr1. PMID: 29657738; PMCID: PMC5894527.DOI
10.1136/lupus-2018-000258ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/lupus-2018-000258
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Related articles
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
- Authors: Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W
- Issue date: 2020 Nov
- Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
- Authors: Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P
- Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
- The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
- Authors: Johnston PG, Daly PA, Liu E
- Issue date: 1999
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: an evidence-based analysis.
- Authors: Medical Advisory Secretariat
- Issue date: 2004