Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRadhakrishnan, Jai
dc.contributor.authorMoutzouris, Dimitrios-Anestis
dc.contributor.authorGinzler, Ellen M
dc.contributor.authorSolomons, Neil
dc.contributor.authorSiempos, Ilias I
dc.contributor.authorAppel, Gerald B
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T19:41:01Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06T19:41:01Z
dc.date.issued2009-11-04
dc.identifier.citationRadhakrishnan J, Moutzouris DA, Ginzler EM, Solomons N, Siempos II, Appel GB. Mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous cyclophosphamide are similar as induction therapy for class V lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2010 Jan;77(2):152-60. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.412. Epub 2009 Nov 4. PMID: 19890271.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1523-1755
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ki.2009.412
dc.identifier.pmid19890271
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/8246
dc.description.abstractClass V lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in one-fifth of biopsy-proven cases of systemic lupus erythematosus. To study the effectiveness of treatments in this group of patients, we pooled analysis of two large randomized controlled multicenter trials of patients with diverse ethnic and racial background who had pure class V disease. These patients received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) as induction therapy for 24 weeks, with percentage change in proteinuria and serum creatinine as end points. Weighted mean differences, pooled odds ratios, and confidence intervals were calculated by using a random-effects model. A total of 84 patients with class V disease were divided into equal groups, each group had comparable entry variables but one received MMF and one received IVC. Within these groups, 33 patients on MMF and 32 patients on IVC completed 24 weeks of treatment. There were no differences between the groups in mean values for the measured end points. Similarly, no difference was found regarding the number of patients who did not complete the study or who died. In patients with nephrotic syndrome, no difference was noted between those treated with MMF and IVC regarding partial remission or change in urine protein. Hence we found that the response to MMF as induction treatment of patients with class V LN appears to be no different from that to IVC.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.kidney-international.org/article/S0085-2538(15)54206-3/fulltexten_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleMycophenolate mofetil and intravenous cyclophosphamide are similar as induction therapy for class V lupus nephritis.en_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleKidney internationalen_US
dc.source.volume77
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage152
dc.source.endpage60
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-02-06T19:41:02Z
html.description.abstractClass V lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in one-fifth of biopsy-proven cases of systemic lupus erythematosus. To study the effectiveness of treatments in this group of patients, we pooled analysis of two large randomized controlled multicenter trials of patients with diverse ethnic and racial background who had pure class V disease. These patients received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) as induction therapy for 24 weeks, with percentage change in proteinuria and serum creatinine as end points. Weighted mean differences, pooled odds ratios, and confidence intervals were calculated by using a random-effects model. A total of 84 patients with class V disease were divided into equal groups, each group had comparable entry variables but one received MMF and one received IVC. Within these groups, 33 patients on MMF and 32 patients on IVC completed 24 weeks of treatment. There were no differences between the groups in mean values for the measured end points. Similarly, no difference was found regarding the number of patients who did not complete the study or who died. In patients with nephrotic syndrome, no difference was noted between those treated with MMF and IVC regarding partial remission or change in urine protein. Hence we found that the response to MMF as induction treatment of patients with class V LN appears to be no different from that to IVC.
dc.description.institutionSUNY Downstateen_US
dc.description.departmentRheumatologyen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.journalKidney international


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
PIIS0085253815542063.pdf
Size:
247.9Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International