Considerations of variability and power for long-term monitoring of stream fish assemblages
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Date Published
2021-02
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Little attention has been given to optimizing statistical power for monitoring stream fish assemblages. We explored the relationship between temporal variability and statistical power using 34 metrics from fish community data collected annually at six sites over 10 years via electrofishing. Metric variability differed by the life stage and group of species considered, use of abundance or mass data, and data standardization technique. Lower variability was associated with community data, abundance data, and time-based standardizations, while greater variability was associated with young-of- the-year data, mass data, and area-based standardizations. Simulation-based power analysis indicated metric choice, and to a lesser degree, monitoring design (annual, biennial, endpoints, or haphazard sampling) influenced power to detect change. Across a fixed number of surveys (N = 60), endpoints sampling performed best. The N needed to detect change was heavily dependent upon metric choice for all monitoring designs, with the most biologically specific metrics requiring greater N. Large savings in effort and resource expenditure can be obtained utilizing biologically relevant metrics that are robust to temporal noise within an appropriate sampling design.Citation
Scott D. George, Daniel S. Stich, and Barry P. Baldigo. Considerations of variability and power for long-term monitoring of stream fish assemblages. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 78(3): 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0013DOI
dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0013ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0013
Scopus Count