Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGeisert, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-21T16:06:26Z
dc.date.available2022-12-21T16:06:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/8001
dc.description.abstractOur world is ever-changing due to technology’s rapid progress; some changes have been beneficial while others have been detrimental. My Honors Thesis focuses on exploring whether such progress has had a positive or negative impact on the art world and its audiences. As such, the purpose of this paper is to illustrate the difference between direct observation of still works of art versus being able to be fully immersed in said works via projection technologies. Starting with a brief history of the artist Vincent Van Gogh, as well as an examination of the Impressionist movement in Paris in the 19th c., will lead me to an analysis of direct observation of his paintings, which was how works during his lifetime were meant to be experienced. I will then take my experience of the Beyond Van Gogh exhibition and compare the two. While each method of viewing art has its merits, the ability to emotionally connect with Van Gogh’s works is magnified by the immersive format, and I will show how these technologies have the power to revive history for a whole new generation of young artists.en_US
dc.language.isoN/Aen_US
dc.publisherSUNY Brockport, Honors Collegeen_US
dc.subjectVincent Van Goghen_US
dc.subjectBeyond Van Gogh exhibitionen_US
dc.subjectImpressionismen_US
dc.titleArt and Technology: Reviving Van Gogh for a New Generationen_US
dc.typeSenior Projecten_US
dc.description.versionNAen_US
refterms.dateFOA2022-12-21T16:06:27Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockporten_US
dc.description.departmentHonors Collegeen_US
dc.description.degreelevelBAen_US
dc.description.advisorChase, Alisia


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
geisert_m_art_english_2022may18.pdf
Size:
5.138Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record