Virtual Reality Hemifield Measurements for Corrective Surgery Eligibility in Ptosis Patients: A Pilot Clinical Trial.
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Warburton, Andrew J
Valliani, Aly A
Serafini, Randal A
Hovstadius, S Malin
Navarro, Vicente N
Chelnis, James G
Journal titleTranslational vision science & technology
Publication Begin page35
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPurpose: We developed an accelerated virtual reality (VR) suprathreshold hemifield perimetry algorithm, the median cut hemifield test (MCHT). This study examines the ability of the MCHT to determine ptosis severity and its reversibility with an artificial improvement by eyelid taping on an HTC Vive Pro Eye VR headset and the Humphrey visual field analyzer (HVFA) to assess the capabilities of emerging technologies in evaluating ptosis. Methods: In a single visit, the MCHT was administered along with the HVFA 30-2 on ptotic untaped and taped eyelids in a randomized order. The primary end points were a superior field visibility comparison with severity of VF loss and VF improvement after taping for MCHT and HVFA. Secondary end points included evaluating patients' Likert-scaled survey responses on the comfort, speed, and overall experience with both testing modalities. Results: VR's MCHT superior field degrees visible correlated well for severe category margin to reflex distance (r = 0.78) compared with HVFA's (r = -0.21). The MCHT also demonstrated noninferiority (83.3% agreement; P = 1) against HVFA for detection of 30% or more superior visual field improvement after taping, warranting a corrective surgical intervention. In comparing hemi-VF in untaped eyes, both tests demonstrated relative obstruction to the field when comparing normal controls to severe ptosis (HVFA P < 0.05; MCHT P < 0.001), which proved sufficient to demonstrate percent improvement with taping. The secondary end point of patient satisfaction favored VR vision testing presentation mode in terms of comfort (P < 0.01), speed (P < 0.001), and overall experience (P < 0.01). Conclusions: This pilot trial supports the use of MCHT for the quantitative measurement of visual field loss owing to ptosis and the reversibility of ptosis that is tested when conducting a presurgical evaluation. We believe the adoption of MCHT testing in oculoplastic clinics could decrease patient burden and accelerate time to corrective treatment. Translational relevance: In this study, we look at vision field outputs in patients with ptosis to evaluate its severity and improvement with eyelid taping on a low-profile VR-based technology and compare it with HVFA. Our results demonstrate that alternative, portable technologies such as VR can be used to grade the degree of ptosis and determine whether ptosis surgery could provide a significant superior visual field improvement of 30% or more, all while ensuring a more comfortable experience and faster testing time.
CitationLabkovich M, Warburton AJ, Ying S, Valliani AA, Kissel N, Serafini RA, Mathew R, Paul M, Hovstadius SM, Navarro VN, Patel A, Reddy H, Chelnis JG. Virtual Reality Hemifield Measurements for Corrective Surgery Eligibility in Ptosis Patients: A Pilot Clinical Trial. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 3;11(10):35. doi: 10.1167/tvst.11.10.35. PMID: 36282119; PMCID: PMC9617504.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
- A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields.
- Authors: Riemann CD, Hanson S, Foster JA
- Issue date: 2000 Jan
- Superior Visual Field Testing Using Virtual Reality With and Without Eye Tracking for Functional Upper Eyelid Surgery Evaluation: A Pilot Study.
- Authors: Patel AJ, Lee WW, Ziff M, Munshi H, Chang TC, Grajewski AL, Wester ST, Tse DT, Tse BC
- Issue date: 2023 Jul-Aug 01
- Tangent screen perimetry in the evaluation of visual field defects associated with ptosis and dermatochalasis.
- Authors: Fuller ML, Briceño CA, Nelson CC, Bradley EA
- Issue date: 2017
- Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
- Authors: Ahmed Y, Pereira A, Bowden S, Shi RB, Li Y, Ahmed IIK, Arshinoff SA
- Issue date: 2022 Mar-Apr
- A new method for eyelid elevation in glaucoma patients with ptosis during automated perimetry testing.
- Authors: Nesher R, Almog Y, Gorck L, Epstein E, Trick GL
- Issue date: 2007 Mar