Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoen, Marthinus C.
dc.contributor.authorNewell, Bryce Clayton
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Melinda R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T01:01:43Z
dc.date.available2022-11-07T01:01:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-22
dc.identifier.citationMarthinus C. Koen, Bryce Clayton Newell & Melinda R. Roberts (2022) The Pennybridge pioneers: understanding internal stakeholder perceptions of body-worn camera implementation, Journal of Crime and Justice, DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.2022.2112265en_US
dc.identifier.issn0735-648X
dc.identifier.eissn2158-9119
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0735648x.2022.2112265
dc.identifier.pii10.1080/0735648X.2022.2112265
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/7885
dc.description.abstractSince body-worn cameras (BWCs) were catapulted into mainstream discourse, they have diffused rapidly across police agencies in the United States. Research followed swiftly, providing a wealth of information about how the police and citizens make sense of these technologies. Moreover, we have learned how these technologies have impacted important policing outcomes, such as citizen complaints and the use of coercive force during citizen encounters. However, despite the growing body of research, very little is known about how police stakeholders make sense of the implementation of BWCs and about their decision-making throughout the implementation process. Therefore, this research examines the decision to implement BWCs in one mid-sized municipal police department in the United States through the lens of Rogers (2003) Diffusion of Innovations theoretical framework. We rely on semi-structured interviews and observations with 17 stakeholders to address this question. Our findings show that BWC technology generally posed little uncertainty for stakeholders in terms of what it could offer conceptually. However, because the agency was an early adopter, decision-makers were confronted with significant uncertainty about practical matters such as the financial and logistical costs of implementing the technology, in addition to policy creation. These findings have important implications for scholars and practitioners.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInforma UK Limiteden_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectPolice technologyen_US
dc.subjectdiffusion of innovationsen_US
dc.subjectbody-worn camerasen_US
dc.subjectimplementationen_US
dc.titleThe Pennybridge pioneers: understanding internal stakeholder perceptions of body-worn camera implementationen_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Crime and Justiceen_US
dc.source.beginpage1
dc.source.endpage17
dc.description.versionAMen_US
dc.description.institutionSUNY Oswegoen_US
dc.description.departmentCriminal Justiceen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
the pennybridge pioneers revised ...
Size:
264.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record