Accuracy of tele-consultation on management decisions of lesions suspect for melanoma using reflectance confocal microscopy as a stand-alone diagnostic tool.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Scope, ADusza, S W
Pellacani, G
Gill, M
Gonzalez, S
Marchetti, M A
Rabinovitz, H S
Marghoob, A A
Alessi-Fox, C
Halpern, A C
Journal title
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADVDate Published
2018-11-06Publication Volume
33Publication Issue
2Publication Begin page
439Publication End page
446
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) as a stand-alone diagnostic tool for suspect skin lesions has not been extensively studied. Objective: Primary aim was to measure experts' accuracy in RCM-based management decisions. Secondary aim was to identify melanoma-specific RCM features. Methods: The study enrolled patients ≥18 years that underwent biopsy of skin lesions clinically suspected to be melanoma. One hundred lesions imaged by RCM were randomly selected from 439 lesions prospectively collected at four pigmented lesion clinics. The study data set included 23 melanomas, three basal cell and two squamous cell carcinomas, 11 indeterminate melanocytic lesions and 61 benign lesions including 50 nevi. Three expert RCM evaluators were blinded to clinical or dermoscopic images, and to the final histopathological diagnosis. Evaluators independently issued a binary RCM-based management decision, 'biopsy' vs. 'observation'; these decisions were scored against histopathological diagnosis, with 'biopsy' as the correct management decision for malignant and indeterminate lesions. A subset analysis of 23 melanomas and 50 nevi with unequivocal histopathological diagnosis was performed to identify melanoma-specific RCM features. Results: Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy were 74%, 67% and 70% for reader 1, 46%, 84% and 69% for reader 2, and 72%, 46% and 56% for reader 3, respectively. The overall kappa for management decisions was 0.34. Readers had unanimous agreement on management for 50 of the 100 lesions. Non-specific architecture, non-visible papillae, streaming of nuclei, coarse collagen fibres and abnormal vasculature showed a significant association with melanoma in the evaluation of at least two readers. Conclusions: Reflectance confocal microscopy tele-consultation of especially challenging lesions, based on image review without benefit of clinical or dermoscopy images, may be associated with limited diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Architectural and stromal criteria may emerge as potentially useful and reproducible criteria for melanoma diagnosis.Citation
Scope A, Dusza SW, Pellacani G, Gill M, Gonzalez S, Marchetti MA, Rabinovitz HS, Marghoob AA, Alessi-Fox C, Halpern AC. Accuracy of tele-consultation on management decisions of lesions suspect for melanoma using reflectance confocal microscopy as a stand-alone diagnostic tool. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Feb;33(2):439-446. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15257. Epub 2018 Nov 6. PMID: 30242916; PMCID: PMC6372323.DOI
10.1111/jdv.15257ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/jdv.15257
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2018 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
Related articles
- Role of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Analysis of Melanocytic Lesions.
- Authors: Serban ED, Farnetani F, Pellacani G, Constantin MM
- Issue date: 2018 Apr
- Skin Cancer Diagnosis With Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: Reproducibility of Feature Recognition and Accuracy of Diagnosis.
- Authors: Farnetani F, Scope A, Braun RP, Gonzalez S, Guitera P, Malvehy J, Manfredini M, Marghoob AA, Moscarella E, Oliviero M, Puig S, Rabinovitz HS, Stanganelli I, Longo C, Malagoli C, Vinceti M, Pellacani G
- Issue date: 2015 Oct
- Reflectance confocal microscopy analysis of equivocal melanocytic lesions with severe regression.
- Authors: Agozzino M, Ferrari A, Cota C, Franceschini C, Buccini P, Eibenshutz L, Ardigò M
- Issue date: 2018 Feb
- Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults.
- Authors: Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Saleh D, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Patel L, Davenport C, Takwoingi Y, Godfrey K, Matin RN, Patalay R, Williams HC, Cochrane Skin Cancer Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group
- Issue date: 2018 Dec 4
- Improvement of diagnostic confidence and management of equivocal skin lesions by integration of reflectance confocal microscopy in daily practice: Prospective study in 2 referral skin cancer centers.
- Authors: Yélamos O, Manubens E, Jain M, Chavez-Bourgeois M, Pulijal SV, Dusza SW, Marchetti MA, Barreiro A, Marino ML, Malvehy J, Cordova MA, Rossi AM, Rajadhyaksha M, Halpern AC, Puig S, Marghoob AA, Carrera C
- Issue date: 2020 Oct