Facial asymmetry tracks genetic diversity among Gorilla subspecies
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
McGrath, KateEriksen, Amandine B.
García-Martínez, Daniel
Galbany, Jordi
Gómez-Robles, Aida
Massey, Jason S.
Fatica, Lawrence M.
Glowacka, Halszka
Arbenz-Smith, Keely
Muvunyi, Richard
Stoinski, Tara S.
ranfield, Michael R. C
Gilardi, Kirsten
Shalukoma, Chantal
de Merode, Emmanuel
Gilissen, Emmanuel
Tocheri, Matthew W.
McFarlin, Shannon C.
Heuzé, Yann
Journal title
Proceedings of the Royal Society BDate Published
2022-02
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Mountain gorillas are particularly inbred compared to other gorillas and even the most inbred human populations. As mountain gorilla skeletal material accumulated during the 1970s, researchers noted their pronounced facial asymmetry and hypothesized that it reflects a population-wide chewing side preference. However, asymmetry has also been linked to environmental and genetic stress in experimental models. Here, we examine facial asymmetry in 114 crania from three Gorilla subspecies using 3D geometric morphometrics. We measure fluctuating asymmetry (FA), defined as random deviations from perfect symmetry, and population-specific patterns of directional asymmetry (DA). Mountain gorillas, with a current population size of about 1000 individuals, have the highest degree of facial FA (explaining 17% of total facial shape variation), followed by Grauer gorillas (9%) and western lowland gorillas (6%), despite the latter experiencing the greatest ecological and dietary variability. DA, while significant in all three taxa, explains relatively less shape variation than FA does. Facial asymmetry correlates neither with tooth wear asymmetry nor increases with age in a mountain gorilla subsample, undermining the hypothesis that facial asymmetry is driven by chewing side preference. An examination of temporal trends shows that stress-induced developmental instability has increased over the last 100 years in these endangered apes.Citation
Kate McGrath, Amandine B. Eriksen, Daniel García-Martínez, Jordi Galbany, Aida Gómez-Robles, Jason S. Massey, Lawrence M. Fatica, Halszka Glowacka, Keely Arbenz-Smith, Richard Muvunyi, Tara S. Stoinski, Michael R. Cranfield, Kirsten Gilardi, Chantal Shalukoma, Emmanuel de Merode, Emmanuel Gilissen, Matthew W. Tocheri, Shannon C. McFarlin and Yann Heuzé. (2022). Facial asymmetry tracks genetic diversity among Gorilla subspecies. Proc. R. Soc. B. 289, 20212564. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2564.DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2564Description
Electronic Accessibility Statement: SUNY Oneonta is committed to providing equal access to college information by ensuring our digital content is accessible by everyone regardless of physical, sensory, or cognitive ability. This item has been checked by Adobe Acrobat Accessibility Check and remediated with the following result: [Remediation: language, title, tagged, reading order / Hazards: alt text]. To request further accessibility remediation on this SOAR repository item for your specific needs, please contact openaccess@oneonta.edu.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2564
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons