Can athletes be tough yet compassionate to themselves? Practical implications for NCAA mental health best practice no. 4
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Stamatis, AndreasDeal, Paul J.
Morgan, Grant B.
Forsse, Jeffrey S.
Papadakis, Zacharias
McKinley-Barnard, Sarah
Scudamore, Eric M.
Koutakis, Panagiotis
Keyword
MultidisciplinaryJournal title
PLOS ONEDate Published
2020-12-31Publication Volume
15Publication Issue
12Publication Begin page
e0244579
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Recent tragic events and data from official NCAA reports suggest student-athletes’ wellbeing is compromised by symptoms of mental health (MH) disorders. Self-compassion (SC) and mental toughness (MT) are two psychological constructs that have been shown effective against stressors associated with sports. The purpose of this study was to investigate SC, MT, and MH in a NCAA environment for the first time and provide practical suggestions for MH best practice No.4. In total, 542 student-athletes participated across Divisions (Mage = 19.84, SD = 1.7). Data were collected through Mental Toughness Index, Self-Compassion Scale, and Mental Health Continuum–Short Form. MT, SC (including mindfulness), and MH were positively correlated. Males scored higher than females on all three scales. No differences were found between divisions. SC partially mediated the MT-MH relationship, but moderation was not significant. Working towards NCAA MH best practice should include training athletes in both MT and SC skills (via mindfulness).Citation
Stamatis, A., Deal, P. J., Morgan, G. B., Forsse, J. S., Papadakis, Z., McKinley-Barnard, S., Scudamore, E. M., & Koutakis, P. (2020). Can athletes be tough yet compassionate to themselves? Practical implications for NCAA mental health best practice no. 4. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0244579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244579DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0244579ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0244579
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/