Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCohenMiller, Anna S.
dc.contributor.authorSchnackenberg, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorDemers, Denise
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-20T14:38:38Z
dc.date.available2021-10-20T14:38:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-19
dc.identifier.citationCohenMiller, A. S., Schnackenberg, H., & Demers, D. (2020). Rigid Flexibility: Seeing the Opportunities in “Failed” Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920963782en_US
dc.identifier.issn1609-4069
dc.identifier.eissn1609-4069
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1609406920963782
dc.identifier.pii10.1177/1609406920963782
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/6988
dc.description.abstractThis article highlights an experience of “failing” within a qualitative research study. Specifically, the authors speak to the failure of recruiting participants in conducting synchronous video and telephone interviews. Drawing from literature in business and examples from research method texts to demonstrate the cross-disciplinary concerns and insights of failure within one’s work, the authors discuss how failure can be reframed as opportunity through the lens of “rigid flexibility” and the innovative steps they implemented. Providing additional insight into the process of framing and reframing failure in research, the authors integrate poetic inquiry as a tool for reflection to highlight their process and suggested steps for new researchers. The authors argue that researchers can approach studies with the idea that failures in the planning and/or execution can lead to opportunities and new insights.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectrigid flexibilityen_US
dc.subjectonline researchen_US
dc.subjectqualitative research methodsen_US
dc.subjectsynchronous and asynchronous interviewingen_US
dc.subjectFacebooken_US
dc.subjecttextingen_US
dc.subjectvideo-conferenceen_US
dc.subjectcross-disciplinaryen_US
dc.subjectpoetic inquiryen_US
dc.subjectmothers in academiaen_US
dc.subjectacademic pipelineen_US
dc.subjectrigoren_US
dc.subjecthigher educationen_US
dc.subjectinclusionen_US
dc.titleRigid Flexibility: Seeing the Opportunities in “Failed” Qualitative Researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleInternational Journal of Qualitative Methodsen_US
dc.source.volume19
dc.source.beginpage160940692096378
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2021-10-20T14:38:39Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Plattsburghen_US
dc.description.departmentTeacher Educationen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
CohenMiller et al_2020_Rigid ...
Size:
256.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International