Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLong, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorSands, Nichole
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T14:17:16Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T14:17:16Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/6927
dc.description.abstractWhen forming a government one must consider how the laws of the state will align with moral principles. One such possible moral principle is called ‘impartial consequentialism’. That is the thesis according to which an action is morally right if and only if it maximizes the aggregate good. This honors thesis will discuss three issues. The first issue is whether and to what extent impartial consequentialism has influenced the formation of the United States government. The second issue is the apparent conflict between the Bill of Rights and the concept of impartial consequentialism. The third issue involves a potential objection that one might raise to the role of impartial consequentialism in the United States government.
dc.subjectGovernment
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectImpartial Consequentialism
dc.subjectUnited States Of America
dc.titleThe Role of Impartial Consequentialism in the United States Government
dc.typethesis
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-08T14:17:16Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.description.departmentPhilosophy
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitleSenior Honors Theses
dc.contributor.organizationThe College at Brockport
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
honors/138/fulltext (1).pdf
Size:
343.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record