Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBusch, Austin M.
dc.contributor.authorKoch, Caitlyn
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T14:16:45Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T14:16:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/6761
dc.description.abstractThere is no doubt that the Bible is filled with the concept of violence, especially in the New Testament, where Jesus faces the violence of persecution in his own life. There is also no doubt that the synoptic gospels each has its own way of addressing this violence: Mark responds to the violence with Jesus’s passivity, while Matthew, Luke, and John, each to their own extent, teach about non-retaliation and doing good to those who wrong you through their depictions of Jesus’s response to violence. Significantly, Matthew depicts Jesus’s response to violence in two different ways: first, Jesus teaches submission and peacemaking on earth, but when he speaks of his post-resurrection return to the earth, he promises vengeance in the eschatological setting. These two different positions on violence create two contradictory versions of Jesus in Matthew: the peaceful, earthly Jesus, and the vengeful and violent eschatological Jesus.
dc.subjectBible
dc.subjectGospel Of Matthew
dc.subjectViolence
dc.subjectLegal System
dc.subjectMedieval
dc.subjectLaw
dc.titleThe Impact of the Gospel of Matthew on the Treatment of Violence and Self-Defense in the Medieval English and Modern American Legal Systems
dc.typethesis
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-08T14:16:45Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.description.departmentEnglish
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitleSenior Honors Theses
dc.contributor.organizationThe College at Brockport
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
honors/265/fulltext (1).pdf
Size:
511.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record