Models of offender rehabilitation : a comparison of the risk, need, responsivity model and the good lives model
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
KeywordResearch Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::Psychology
Criminals - Rehabilitation
Sex offenders - Rehabilitation
Sex offenders - Treatment
Good Lives Model (GLM)
Risk, Need, Responsivity Model (RNR)
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractWithin five years of release from prison, three quarters (76.6%) of offenders across 30 state correctional systems are re-arrested, while total state costs for corrections in the U.S. exceed $48 billion. The bleak outlook for over 6.8 million offenders and the burden on their communities makes the continued improvement of offender rehabilitation theory imperative. Improvements in theory can drive improvement in rehabilitation programs in both community and institutional corrections. The risk, need, responsivity model (RNR) of criminal rehabilitation has become the dominant evidence-based framework for professionals in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K. However, critics argue that the model’s focus on reducing the likelihood of offending results in many RNR-based programs lacking an orientation that seeks to fully reintegrate offenders into communities as well-adjusted, contributing members of those communities. In contrast, the recent development of the good lives model (GLM) utilizes positive psychology principles to produce interventions based on character strengths, making the achievement of a meaningful, happy, and socially adjusted life its primary objective. Though GLM has been taken by some as an alternative to RNR, the two models are not mutually exclusive: the literature suggests that those areas where RNR lacks specificity can be clarified and enriched by the GLM model. Further, with a paucity of empirical literature to support the claims of GLM, it is argued that the Values in Action (VIA) model of character strengths and character strengths interventions should be utilized to inform continued research in the field. Such a synergy could lead to the development of programs that include evidence-based interventions to reduce re-offending, while at the same time increasing offenders’ chances of re-integrating into communities and leading meaningful lives. Finally, the social setting in which individual rehabilitation occurs is explored, and the implications for theories of offender rehabilitation are discussed.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Creating a model of integrated restorative justice and treatment for juvenile sex offendersQuinn, Caitlin (2018-05)The current United States criminal justice system uses a strictly punitive approach in handling cases of sex offenses committed by juveniles. This paper addresses the failures of the current system and analyzes the positive and negative aspects of three alternative models: restorative justice, multisystemic therapy, and the Good Lives Model. Drawing on sociological, criminological, and feminist literature, crime databases, and interviews with professionals in the fields of restorative and juvenile justice, it is shown that no single model meets the needs of stakeholders in juvenile sex offense cases. Instead, I will propose an integrated holistic model of restorative justice and multifaceted treatment that utilizes the most effective aspects of existing alternative models and adds program components related to sexuality and consent would be most beneficial for use with juvenile sex offenders.
Examining the potential similarities and influences of Stanley Greenspan's developmental, individual differences, relationship based (DIR)floortime model and music therapy in the treatment of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Kellogg, Jenna L. (2013-03-27)The purpose of this qualitative comparative case study was to explore the relationship between Stanley Greenspan's DIR/Floortime Model and music therapy in the treatment of children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This topic was explored through the perspectives of four special education teachers who implement the DIR/Floortime model within their present classrooms at the agency where the researcher is employed as a music therapist. All of the selected teachers witnessed and experienced music therapy treatment for present and past students in both group and individual sessions. Each teacher participated in one individual interview with the researcher lasting 30 to 60 minutes. Each interview was transcribed by the researcher and analyzed for commonalities including key words and themes that were central to the research questions. The findings of this study indicated that the influences of music therapy treatment for children diagnosed with ASD are largely positive and have the potential to spur growth and development. According to the interviewed special education teachers, the qualities of music therapy that most aid their students to learn and grow include: "motivating", "calming", and " focusing." In addition, the teachers largely recognized a strong connection between the methodology and philosophies of music therapy treatment and Greenspan's DIR/ Floortime model. The keywords and themes that were addressed in discussing this were "following the child's lead", "motivation", and "exploration." Lastly, the process of conducting the study largely resulted in the researcher finding new awareness regarding the importance of interdisciplinary communication and collaboration.
Retangular fraction models.Kibler, Rachael H. (2015)The purpose of this mixed methods study was to explore how implementation of a new, researcher-developed simple improvised manipulative (SIM) impacted 5th graders in an urban, Common Core-aligned classroom. The Rectangular Fraction Model, a SIM created with two overlapping pieces of transparent plastic, was tested through performance of this experiment. This research sought to answer the following two central questions: How does implementation of a SIM, the Rectangular Fraction Model, impact 5th grade students’ math achievement in a mathematics class at an urban Chautauqua County elementary school in Western New York? How does use of a concrete representation affect students’ conceptual understanding of abstract material as taught through the Common-Core aligned EngageNY curriculum? The researcher was interested in two areas of possible impact on student learning; student achievement measured by a formal assessment and student understanding of abstract materials evaluated through use of an interview and questionnaire. Twelve students participated in the study; they were placed in heterogeneous control and experimental groups. The results indicate that although students in the experimental group scored better on the post test and appeared to have a better understanding of the concept taught, the difference between the control and the experimental group was not statistically significant. Thus, the use of SIM is not more effective than the traditional teaching approach. However, student responses indicate an interest in using this type of intervention material, and further research should be conducted on the impact of SIM in the mathematics classroom.