Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWitnauer, James
dc.contributor.advisorAbwender, David A.
dc.contributor.advisorSnarr, Jeffery D.
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, L. Jack
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T14:12:25Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T14:12:25Z
dc.date.issued5/15/2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/6609
dc.description.abstractThe literature on human and nonhuman animal interval timing disagrees about whether perceived time is a linear or power function of real time, and to what extent reward influences timing performance. Two competing computational learning and timing models, Temporal Difference (TD, Schultz, 2013) and Sometimes Competing Retrieval (SOCR, Stout & Miller, 2007) are reviewed. The present experiments investigate human interval timing error in both reward and non-reward conditions. The experiments were simulated by a computational model to identify both the function that describes the effect of interval duration on the distribution of variance (e.g., scalar or linear) and the relative predictive power of the SOCR and TD models, and the effects of reward on interval timing. Specifically, it was hypothesized that 1) timing variability is scalar, not linear, 2) that a modified SOCR model explains the data, and 3) that interval timing performance is less variable in rewarding situations than in non-rewarding situations. Timing trials involved the presentation of a reference duration; participants then produced their estimate of that duration while under cognitive load (random number generation and serial math tasks) through key presses on a computer. The results failed to support these hypotheses. However, reward produced a nonsignificant tendency towards early responding. Finally, suggestions for further research, including further computational modeling and investigation of the neural substrata of reward and timing are discussed.
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectReward
dc.subjectComputational Modeling
dc.subjectSOCR
dc.subjectRTCM
dc.subjectScalar Timing
dc.titleTiming Performance Error in Rewarded and Non-Rewarded Tasks
dc.typethesis
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-08T14:12:25Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.description.departmentPsychology
dc.description.degreelevelMaster of Arts (MA)
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePsychology Master's Theses
dc.contributor.organizationThe College at Brockport
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
psh_theses/9/fulltext (1).pdf
Size:
855.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record