Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Arthur E.
dc.contributor.advisorRobinson, Scott D.
dc.contributor.authorBernitt, Darcy
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T14:11:18Z
dc.date.available2021-09-08T14:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2000-05-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/6588
dc.description.abstractNone provided. From statement of problem: How do you define good reading? How often do you come across students who read with hesitations, repetitions, word miscalls, and exhibit word by word reading and slow decoding of words? Oral fluency is seen as a necessary feature in defining good reading (Allington, 1983). A lack of fluency in oral reading, usually described as word by word reading or unlanguage like reading, is often seen as a characteristic of poor readers .
dc.subjectReading Skills
dc.subjectOral Fluency
dc.subjectStudents With Disabilities
dc.titleThe Effects of Peer Tutors: Using the Neurological Impress Method with Seven Students With Learning Disabilities
dc.typethesis
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-08T14:11:18Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.description.degreelevelMaster of Science in Education (MSEd)
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitleMaster's Theses
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
theses/15/fulltext (1).pdf
Size:
3.029Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record