Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Zaborowski, Ashley R.Keyword
Literature CirclesTalk
Reading Roles
Jobs
Job Sharing
Comprehension
Presentational Talk
Cumulative Talk
Exploratory Talk
Anecdotal Talk
Performing Voice
Exit Ticket
Date Published
2014-11-21
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This study explores the kinds of talk that take place during literature circles, and how those kinds of talk impact the students’ comprehension of a text. This study also investigates how the use of reading roles or jobs impact the way students converse during literature circle discussions. The participants in this study were 4th grade students who had a variety of reading levels. Data were collected through the use of audio recordings, observations, and student work (exit tickets). The data were collected and analyzed using a constant comparison method. The findings of this study show that the students took part in a variety of kinds of talk, such as: presentational talk, cumulative talk, exploratory talk, anecdotal talk, and performing voice. The students showed varying levels of comprehension that coincided with the kind of talk that was taking place. Students showed the most increased comprehension of the text when they took part in exploratory talk. Another finding of this study was that reading roles or jobs can help and/or hinder the quality of conversations depending on how the job was shared. When students partially shared their jobs, they were able to elicit conversation from their classmates, in comparison to when they shared their jobs in their entirety, and little to no conversation followed.