• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Colleges
    • SUNY Brockport
    • Theses
    • Education and Human Development Master's Theses
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Colleges
    • SUNY Brockport
    • Theses
    • Education and Human Development Master's Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of SUNY Open Access RepositoryCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentAuthor ProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Campus Communities in SOAR

    Alfred State CollegeBrockportBroomeCantonDownstateEmpireFredoniaMaritimeNew PaltzOneontaOptometryOswegoPlattsburghSUNY Polytechnic InstituteSUNY Office of Community Colleges and the Education PipelineSUNY PressUpstate Medical

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    An Investigation and Comparison of the Reading Comprehension Strategies of Remedial Readers Designated for a PSEN Program and Readers Not Designated for PSEN

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    ehd_theses/1168/fulltext (1).pdf
    Size:
    808.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Author
    Schulitz, Jane
    Keyword
    Reading Assessments
    Student Progress
    Student Evaluation
    Reading Proficiency
    Whole-Language Instruction
    Reading Performance
    Remedial Readers
    PSEN Program
    Reading Comprehension
    Reading Strategy
    Thinking-Out-Loud
    Show allShow less
    Date Published
    1987-07-01
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/5197
    Abstract
    The comprehension strategies of ten remedial readers selected for a PSEN program and ten randomly selected non-remedial readers were studied to see if and how comprehension strategies differed for good and poor readers. The subjects were tested individually using the Thinking-Out-Loud (TOL) procedure and instructed to read a story sentence by sentence. Instructions, with minimal guidelines, were given to each subject to read each sentence and discuss thoughts occurring before proceeding to the next sentence. Responses for the two groups were tabulated, analyzed and categorized separately according to the type of response given and then compared and contrasted with each other. Differences between the groups were found in the total number of elaborations for all categories and the total number of each category. Total overall elaborations were higher for the good readers than for the poor readers. Good readers gave a significantly higher number of responses in all categories except three. Good readers generally gave more responses in categories requiring higher level thinking skills. The three categories which ranked higher in response level for the poor readers were categories requiring a lower-level of reading skill. The results indicated that good readers approach the reading task differently than poor readers and are able to use comprehension strategies more effectively. Recommendations for classroom applications and suggestions for future research were given.
    Collections
    Education and Human Development Master's Theses

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.