Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Proficiency in Solving Word Problems versus Computational Problems
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Morgan, Elaine M.Keyword
Preservice Elementary TeachersWord Problems
Computational Problems
Problem Inventory
Problem Proficiency
Teacher Proficiency
Date Published
19880401
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if preservice elementary teachers are able to solve word problems as proficiently as they can perform related computational problems on a word problem inventory. The subjects were 44 preservice elementary teachers at SUNY College at Brockport, Brockport, NY. They were enrolled in a course titled Methods in the Teaching of Elementary School Mathematics. A word problem inventory was created for this study by selecting word problems from the AddisonWesley Mathematics series for grades 4 to 8. The inventory consisted of two parts, word problems on part 1 and computations on part 2. For the purpose of analysis, a dependent ttest was used to determine if there was a significant difference between the mean mathematics scores on part 2 computational problems and part 1 word problems. The amount of difference between the mean scores that was greater than the average of the related standard deviations will be the criteria which will determine if the results are educationally important. The coefficient of correlation was used to determine the degree to which computational proficiency explained word problem proficiency. The difference between the mean performance on computational problems and word problems was statistically significant. The mean scores that were obtained exceeded the criteria for educational importance. Thus, these results were educationally important. Only 50% of the variation in word problem test scores was explained by computational problem test scores. The other 50% of the variation in word problem solving ability remained unexplained.Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

A Focus on Making Great ProblemSolversMalik, Lisa Renee; The College at Brockport (20060801)The main focus of this research was to design and implement a strategy that students could use to help them in problemsolving multistep problems that are the main focus of state assessments. Related literature focused on four major steps that should be used when problemsolving. These four steps are closely aligned with Polyas' problemsolving process. My goal in this research was to show that students are struggling with using problemsolving techniques to solve multistep mathematical problems. Students struggle with reading comprehension and common mathematic vocabulary. Students can solve basic computational math problems, but when embedded within a word problem, this becomes rather cumbersome. I first made a pretest that had three previous state exam questions. Then, to aid students in this process, my fellow colleagues and I devised a graphic organizer that was based off of Polyas' problemsolving process. We called this organizer QNPS. This graphic organizer was to help students organize their thought process into four major steps. Throughout the first semester I gave students opportunity to try this process. Students were then given a test/survey similar to the pretest. The last measurement piece would be the seventh grade state exam. Through this research process I learned that if students are to be successful on these state exams then we need to teach more than just content. We need to model how the content can be embedded into reallife application questions.

College Students' Exploration of Isomorphic Numerical and Word Percent ProblemsTronolone, Emily (State University of New York at Fredonia, 201606)This study examines students' ability to solve percent problems when in word form versus numeric form. The work of University PreCalculus students was analyzed with two isomorphic assessments measuring the accuracy of the problem solution when given in word versus numerical form. It was hypothesized that college students would perform better on numerical percent problems, specifically working with discount, tax, and tip problems. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that the words would hinder the students' ability to accurately solve percent problems when in word form compared to numeric form. The results of this study prove the hypothesis to be inaccurate. In contrast to the hypothesis, students performed better on word problems versus numerical problems (pvalue of 0.013) when the problem specifically dealt with discounts, tax, percent increase, and percent decrease.

A study of middle school and college students' misconceptions about solving multistep linear equations.Powell, Amber N. (20130111)This study examines the types of mistakes that students make solving multistep linear equations. During this study, students completed a 15problem test containing different types of multistep linear equations appropriate for 8th graders according to the state and national mathematics standards. Students were not allowed to use a calculator. The instrument was generated by using past state tests and by polling professors of mathematics. The number of mistakes made for each mathematical property was recorded. The scores were compared to a survey that students answered reporting their confidence in solving these types of problems. The results of the study indicated that problems containing negative numbers and moving terms to the opposite side of the equal sign were incorrect most frequently among all student participants. Additional results revealed that eighth graders made more mistakes than collegelevel students, the types of mistakes made were different based on the grade level of the participants, males made fewer mistakes than females and there was a difference in the types of mistakes made based on gender.