Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Proficiency in Solving Word Problems versus Computational Problems
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Morgan, Elaine M.Keyword
Preservice Elementary TeachersWord Problems
Computational Problems
Problem Inventory
Problem Proficiency
Teacher Proficiency
Date Published
1988-04-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine if preservice elementary teachers are able to solve word problems as proficiently as they can perform related computational problems on a word problem inventory. The subjects were 44 preservice elementary teachers at SUNY College at Brockport, Brockport, NY. They were enrolled in a course titled Methods in the Teaching of Elementary School Mathematics. A word problem inventory was created for this study by selecting word problems from the Addison-Wesley Mathematics series for grades 4 to 8. The inventory consisted of two parts, word problems on part 1 and computations on part 2. For the purpose of analysis, a dependent t-test was used to determine if there was a significant difference between the mean mathematics scores on part 2 computational problems and part 1 word problems. The amount of difference between the mean scores that was greater than the average of the related standard deviations will be the criteria which will determine if the results are educationally important. The coefficient of correlation was used to determine the degree to which computational proficiency explained word problem proficiency. The difference between the mean performance on computational problems and word problems was statistically significant. The mean scores that were obtained exceeded the criteria for educational importance. Thus, these results were educationally important. Only 50% of the variation in word problem test scores was explained by computational problem test scores. The other 50% of the variation in word problem solving ability remained unexplained.Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Great Divide: a study of the Effects of Age on Division-Related Problem Solving strategies.Larson, Megan E. (2013-01-23)No author abstract.
-
Executive Functions and Their Relationship to Social Skills and Problem BehaviorsHungerford, Suzanne; Gonyo, Katharine; Whitford, Shasta; Bassendowski, Nancy (2009)This study examined social, behavioral, and executive function characteristics in a group of children referred for auditory and language processing assessment. Teacher ratings of executive functions were compared to parent ratings to determine if teacher's or parent's ratings are better predictors of social skill deficits or problem behaviors. Further, eight executive function skills were examined to determine which are most related to social skills and which are most related to problem behaviors.
-
The In-Crowd: A Study of High School Students' Problem Solving Techniques When Calculating the Area of Irregular PolygonsBradford, Cara (State University of New York at Fredonia, 2016-08)This research investigates student preferences of approaches and techniques used when calculating the area of irregular polygons. On a more conceptual level, this study was designed to analyze whether students demonstrate appropriate problem solving skills or simply the memorization of a single procedure. It was hypothesized that high school mathematics students would tend to choose one method and use that method regardless of its efficiency. To be more specific, it was hypothesized that students would choose the to use the addition method (breaking the polygon into smaller familiar shapes with known area formulas) more than the subtraction method (enclosing the shape in a rectangle and subtracting the area of the empty space) or any other method. The results of this study suggest that, as predicted, students do not use the most efficient method for calculating the area of an irregular polygon 72% of the time. However, further analysis reveals that students most often choose to employ methods other than the addition or subtraction method. While less than half of participants were able to use those other methods correctly, approximately two thirds of those who used the preferred methods (addition or subtraction) obtained correct answers.