A Case Study: Recall of Mathematical Facts Comparing Students Labeled Educable Mentally Retarded (EMR) with their Average Peers
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
McConnell, Kerri S.Date Published
1999-07-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
As the number of inclusion classrooms continue sto grow across the country, educators are quickly noticing the enormous span in ability level among students in one classroom. Given the large number of learning disabilities, the well-known ones often overshadow the less commonly known disabilities. Programs designed to best suit the needs of a majority of students in an inclusion classroom can thus miss the needs of students with these uncommon disabilities. Educable Mental Retardation (EMR) is interpreted as a student who cannot function in society or a classroom without additional help. This case study is designed to understand the abilities of students who are identified as EMR so that programs can be designed to meet their needs in the classroom. The author examined a blended third/fourth grade classroom which included students with special needs and two students with EMR. The author asked: Are Educable Mentally Retarded (EMR) students able to recall the same amount of mathematical information as average students? Which activities do the students who are EMR believe are most beneficial to them when learning multiplication? Students were taught multiplication facts using several different strategies designed to assist recall. Several tests were given to assess recall ability. Following the study, two random students and the two students with EMR with interviewed. The author found that the students with EMR were unable to recall the same amount of information as average students. Daily repetition of facts and strategies, as well as one-on-one support is found to be beneficial.