Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMulenga, Maidstone
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T21:04:08Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T21:04:08Z
dc.date.issued5/13/1999
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/4580
dc.description.abstractWith journalism credibility at its lowest ebb, more newspapers are taking time to correct mistakes and apologize for errors. In this thesis, I use Kenneth Burke's theories to analyze newspaper corrections through guilt-redemption, purification and image restoration strategies. This study looks at two types of redemptive rhetoric and image-restoration strategies: front-page apologies and daily corrections from four newspapers. The front-page apologies are from The News Examiner and the Cincinnati Enquirer. The daily corrections are from The New York Times and the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle. This thesis contends that newspapers should use mortification in corrections and apologies because it is the proper rejoinder in maintaining credibility with readers, even when victimage is the preferred strategy of guilt redemption.
dc.subjectKenneth Burke
dc.subjectJournalism Ethics
dc.titleTo our Readers : A Study of Guilt Redemption in Newspaper Corrections
dc.typethesis
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T21:04:08Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.description.departmentCommunication
dc.description.degreelevelMaster of Arts (MA)
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitleCommunication Theses
dc.contributor.organizationThe College at Brockport
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
cmc_theses/5/fulltext (1).pdf
Size:
2.658Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record