Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughes, Graham
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:32:05Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:32:05Z
dc.date.issued1970-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/3405
dc.description.abstractAt trial, a civil disobedient may appeal to his reasonable belief in the unconstitutionality of the law that he violated. However, he cannot appeal to any technical difficulties that would require him to lie about his performance of the act in question, or about the role of his conscience in motivating his action.
dc.subjectCivil Disobedience
dc.subjectDemocracy
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectPolitical Philosophy
dc.titleResponse to Professor Marshall Cohen
dc.typearticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T19:32:05Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.source.peerreviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePhilosophic Exchange
dc.contributor.organizationNew York University
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
phil_ex/vol1/iss1/2/fulltext ...
Size:
1.983Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophic Exchange
    Philosophic Exchange is published by the Center for Philosophic Exchange, at the College at Brockport. The Center for Philosophic Exchange was founded by SUNY Chancellor Samuel Gould in 1969 to conduct a continuing program of philosophical inquiry, relating to both academic and public issues. Each year the Center hosts four speakers, and each speaker gives a public lecture that is intended for a general audience. These lectures are then published in this journal.

Show simple item record