Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrieger, Leonard
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:32:04Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:32:04Z
dc.date.issued1971-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/3398
dc.description.abstractThere seem to be inevitabilities both within and without history. Thus, Monroe Beardsley’s analysis of historical inevitability raises this question: what is the relationship between the extra-historical and the historical inevitability? There seems to be an assumption that the concept of inevitability is the same within and without history. I wish to question that assumption. There are distinctively historical forms of inevitability that cannot be assimilated to other kinds of inevitability.
dc.subjectPhilosophy Of History
dc.subjectInevitability
dc.subjectDeterminism
dc.subjectMonroe Beardsley
dc.titleComment on Monroe Beardsley’s ‘Inevitability in History’
dc.typearticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T19:32:04Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.source.peerreviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePhilosophic Exchange
dc.contributor.organizationColumbia University
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
phil_ex/vol2/iss1/3/fulltext ...
Size:
717.2Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophic Exchange
    Philosophic Exchange is published by the Center for Philosophic Exchange, at the College at Brockport. The Center for Philosophic Exchange was founded by SUNY Chancellor Samuel Gould in 1969 to conduct a continuing program of philosophical inquiry, relating to both academic and public issues. Each year the Center hosts four speakers, and each speaker gives a public lecture that is intended for a general audience. These lectures are then published in this journal.

Show simple item record