Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:32:03Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:32:03Z
dc.date.issued1/1/1971
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/3396
dc.description.abstractThe major disagreement here is that Foot, contra Kant, denies that moral ends are ends that the agent has a duty to adopt. Though I, in part, agree with Foot, it is difficult to see what is paradoxical about the view that she denies. Foot’s position is the one that appears paradoxical. Her position is that I may have duties within morality, but I cannot have a duty to adopt the ends of morality. On the contrary, morality is inescapable.
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectMoral Philosophy
dc.subjectImmanuel Kant
dc.subjectHypothetical Imperative
dc.subjectPhilippa Foot
dc.titleFoot-Notes
dc.typearticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T19:32:03Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.source.peerreviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePhilosophic Exchange
dc.contributor.organizationThe College at Brockport
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
phil_ex/vol2/iss1/18/fulltext ...
Size:
1.322Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophic Exchange
    Philosophic Exchange is published by the Center for Philosophic Exchange, at the College at Brockport. The Center for Philosophic Exchange was founded by SUNY Chancellor Samuel Gould in 1969 to conduct a continuing program of philosophical inquiry, relating to both academic and public issues. Each year the Center hosts four speakers, and each speaker gives a public lecture that is intended for a general audience. These lectures are then published in this journal.

Show simple item record