Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHirsch, Eli
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:31:36Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/3240
dc.description.abstractAccording to one view, death is bad for the one who dies. The challenge for this view is to explain exactly why and when death is bad for the one who dies. According to an alternative view, death is not actually bad for the one who dies. There is a third alternative, according to which the thought of one’s own death elicits an experience that reveals the horror of one’s own death in a way that is ineffable. This paper explores this third alternative.
dc.subjectDeath
dc.subjectValue Theory
dc.subjectMysticism
dc.subjectWilliam James On Death
dc.titleDiabolical Mysticism, Death, and Skepticism
dc.typearticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T19:31:37Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.source.peerreviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePhilosophic Exchange
dc.contributor.organizationBrandeis University
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
phil_ex/vol39/iss1/3/fulltext ...
Size:
505.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophic Exchange
    Philosophic Exchange is published by the Center for Philosophic Exchange, at the College at Brockport. The Center for Philosophic Exchange was founded by SUNY Chancellor Samuel Gould in 1969 to conduct a continuing program of philosophical inquiry, relating to both academic and public issues. Each year the Center hosts four speakers, and each speaker gives a public lecture that is intended for a general audience. These lectures are then published in this journal.

Show simple item record