Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlston, William P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:31:27Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:31:27Z
dc.date.issued1/1/1972
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/3189
dc.description.abstractProfessor Weitz contends that there are no necessary conditions of human action. This paper will focus on his objections to the theories of Roderick Chisholm, Donald Davidson, and others. The disagreement turns on the correct interpretation of certain cases. For example, is falling in love an action? What about missing a target?
dc.subjectPhilosophy Of Action
dc.subjectAction Theory
dc.subjectDonald Davidson
dc.subjectRoderick Chisholm
dc.titleResponse to Weitz
dc.typearticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T19:31:27Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.source.peerreviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePhilosophic Exchange
dc.contributor.organizationRutgers University
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
phil_ex/vol3/iss1/22/fulltext ...
Size:
2.070Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophic Exchange
    Philosophic Exchange is published by the Center for Philosophic Exchange, at the College at Brockport. The Center for Philosophic Exchange was founded by SUNY Chancellor Samuel Gould in 1969 to conduct a continuing program of philosophical inquiry, relating to both academic and public issues. Each year the Center hosts four speakers, and each speaker gives a public lecture that is intended for a general audience. These lectures are then published in this journal.

Show simple item record