Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCohen, Marshall
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:31:25Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:31:25Z
dc.date.issued1/1/1970
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/3177
dc.description.abstractMorris Weitz is mistaken in his interpretation of King Lear. The distinction between good and evil is maintained clearly and sharply throughout the play, and nature actually provides the key to the difference between the two.
dc.subjectShakespeare
dc.subjectKing Lear
dc.subjectMoral Philosophy
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectMetaethics
dc.subjectMeaning Of Life
dc.titleLear and Nature
dc.typearticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T19:31:25Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.source.peerreviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePhilosophic Exchange
dc.contributor.organizationThe Rockefeller University
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
phil_ex/vol1/iss1/6/fulltext ...
Size:
1.716Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophic Exchange
    Philosophic Exchange is published by the Center for Philosophic Exchange, at the College at Brockport. The Center for Philosophic Exchange was founded by SUNY Chancellor Samuel Gould in 1969 to conduct a continuing program of philosophical inquiry, relating to both academic and public issues. Each year the Center hosts four speakers, and each speaker gives a public lecture that is intended for a general audience. These lectures are then published in this journal.

Show simple item record