Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartin Alcoff, Linda
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:31:20Z
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:31:20Z
dc.date.issued1996-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/3154
dc.description.abstractRecent criticism of feminist philosophy poses a dilemma. Feminism is taken to be a substantive set of empirical claims and political commitments, whereas philosophy is taken to be a discipline of thought organized by the pursuit of truth, but uncommitted to any particular truth. This paper responds to this dilemma, and defends the project of feminist philosophy.
dc.subjectFeminism
dc.subjectFeminist Philosophy
dc.subjectEpistemology
dc.subjectMartha Nussbaum
dc.titleIs the Feminist Critique of Reason Rational
dc.typearticle
refterms.dateFOA2021-09-07T19:31:20Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Brockport
dc.source.peerreviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.description.publicationtitlePhilosophic Exchange
dc.contributor.organizationSyracuse University
dc.languate.isoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
phil_ex/vol26/iss1/1/fulltext ...
Size:
3.050Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Philosophic Exchange
    Philosophic Exchange is published by the Center for Philosophic Exchange, at the College at Brockport. The Center for Philosophic Exchange was founded by SUNY Chancellor Samuel Gould in 1969 to conduct a continuing program of philosophical inquiry, relating to both academic and public issues. Each year the Center hosts four speakers, and each speaker gives a public lecture that is intended for a general audience. These lectures are then published in this journal.

Show simple item record