Morally Incompatible? An Analysis of the Relationship Between Competitive Sport and International Relations at the Olympic Games
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Torres, Cesar R.Journal title
SAIS ReviewDate Published
2011-01-01Publication Volume
31Publication Issue
1
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Olympic Games are a multinational and multisport event with unparalleled global allure. As athletes from more than 200 countries convene to compete, they are guided by the “Fundamental Principles of Olympism,” which call for a mutually acceptable quest for excellence through challenge. Critics of Olympism claim the zero-sum nature of competitive challenge promotes extreme patriotism and international animosity rather than cooperative spirit. In light of this criticism and the resilience of the Olympic Games, this paper considers the proposition that athletic competition is incompatible with the goals of the Games, but ultimately rejects that view and provides two policy recommendations to allow the Olympic Games to realize their full potential as a global assembling event.Citation
Cesar R. Torres. "Morally Incompatible?: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Competitive Sport and International Relations at the Olympic Games." SAIS Review 31, no. 1 (2011): 3-16. http://muse.jhu.edu/Description
Copyright © 2011 The Johns Hopkins University Press. This article first appeared in SAIS Review 31.1 (2011) 3-16. Reprinted with permission by The Johns Hopkins University Press.