Hydrogeomorphic Factors and Ecosystem Responses in Coastal Wetlands of the Great Lakes
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Keyword
Coastal WetlandsEcosystem Response
Geomorphology
Great Lakes
Hydrology
Ice
Reference Condition
Seiche
Water Level
Water Quality
SWRA
Journal title
WetlandsDate Published
1999-12-01Publication Volume
19Publication Issue
4
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Gauging the impact of manipulative activities, such as rehabilitation or management, on wetlands requires having a notion of the unmanipulated condition as a reference. An understanding of the reference condition requires knowledge of dominant factors influencing ecosystem processes and biological communities. In this paper, we focus on natural physical factors (conditions and processes) that drive coastal wetland ecosystems of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Great Lakes coastal wetlands develop under conditions of largelake hydrology and disturbance imposed at a hierarchy of spatial and temporal scales and contain biotic communities adapted to unstable and unpredictable conditions. Coastal wetlands are configured along a continuum of hydrogeomorphic types: open coastal wetlands, drowned river mouth and Hooded delta wetlands, and protected wetlands, each developing distinct ecosystem properties and biotic communities. Hydrogeomorphic factors associated with the lake and watershed operate at a hierarchy of scales: a) local and short-term (seiches and ice action), b) watershed /lakewide /annual (seasonal water- level change), and c) larger or year-to-year and longer (regional and/or greater than one-year). Other physical factors include the unique water quality features of each lake. The aim of this paper is to provide scientists and managers with a framework for considering regional and site-specific geomorphometry and a hierarchy of physical processes in planning management and conservation projects.Description
WETLANDS, Vol. 19, No. 4, December 1999, pp. 821-834 © 1999, The Society of Wetland Scientists --- This article is contribution 1033 of the USGS Great Lakes Science Center.