Implications of Hydrologic Variability on the Succession of Plants in Great Lakes wetlands
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Wilcox, Douglas A.Journal title
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & ManagementDate Published
2004-01-01Publication Volume
7Publication Issue
2
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Primary succession of plant communities directed toward a climax is not a typical occurrence in wetlands because these ecological systems are inherently dependent on hydrology, and temporal hydrologic variability often causes reversals or setbacks in succession. Wetlands of the Great Lakes provide good examples for demonstrating the implications of hydrology in driving successional processes and for illustrating potential misinterpretations of apparent successional sequences. Most Great Lakes coastal wetlands follow cyclic patterns in which emergent communities are reduced in area or eliminated by high lake levels and then regenerated from the seed bank during low lake levels. Thus, succession never proceeds for long. Wetlands also develop in ridge and swale terrains in many large embayments of the Great Lakes. These formations contain sequences of wetlands of similar origin but different age that can be several thousand years old, with older wetlands always further from the lake. Analyses of plant communities across a sequence of wetlands at the south end of Lake Michigan showed an apparent successional pattern from submersed to floating to emergent plants as water depth decreased with wetland age. However, paleoecological analyses showed that the observed vegetation changes were driven largely by disturbances associated with increased human settlement in the area. Climateinduced hydrologic changes were also shown to have greater effects on plant-community change than autogenic processes. Other terms, such as zonation, maturation, fluctuations, continuum concept, functional guilds, centrifugal organization, pulse stability, and hump-back models provide additional means of describing organization and changes in vegetation; some of them overlap with succession in describing vegetation processes in Great Lakes wetlands, but each must be used in the proper context with regard to short- and long-term hydrologic variability.Citation
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 7(2):223–231, 2004. online DOI: 10.1080/14634980490461579DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980490461579Description
Author Wilcox worked for the government agency: U.S. Geological Survey–Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 48105;ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980490461579
Scopus Count