Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHosshan, H.
dc.contributor.authorStancliffe, R. J.
dc.contributor.authorVilleneuve, M.
dc.contributor.authorBonati, Michelle L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T20:27:30Z
dc.date.available2021-07-14T20:27:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-29
dc.identifier.citationHosshan, H., Stancliffe, R. J., Villeneuve, M., & Bonati, M. L. (2020). Inclusive schooling in Southeast Asian countries: A scoping review of the literature. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09613-0en_US
dc.identifier.issn1598-1037
dc.identifier.eissn1876-407X
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12564-019-09613-0
dc.identifier.pii9613
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/1849
dc.description.abstractMost of the Southeast Asian region is comprised of developing countries. This region has a short history of inclusive education implementation and differs from developed countries’ more mature inclusive education systems. This review reveals how inclusive schooling has been implemented in Southeast Asian countries and the current practices in the region. We used scoping review methodology to examine peer-reviewed literature published between January 1994 and January 2017 on inclusive schooling in the Southeast Asian countries. The inputs-processes-outcomes (IPO) model was used to group and describe the extant research. Thirty-eight articles were identified that contributed to region of Southeast Asia inclusive education research. The majority (n = 29, 76%) were published after 2010. The articles were organised by IPO stage: Inputs stage (staff professional and teacher education, resources and finances, leadership, curriculum and policy); Processes stage (collaboration and shared responsibility, school practice, classroom practice and climate) and Outcomes stage (participation). The elements of staff professional and teacher education, and collaboration and shared responsibility were most frequently featured in the literature of the inputs and processes stages. Research information about the outcomes stage of inclusive schooling was sparse. The inclusive education literature from the region is still emerging. A greater focus on outcomes is recommended in future research and practice. Having outcome data will enable evaluation of the quality and effectiveness of inclusive education. If evaluation reveals problems, then aspects of the inputs and processes stages may need to be improved to achieve better outcomes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Education Malaysiaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://www.springer.com/tdm
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectInclusive educationen_US
dc.subjectScoping reviewen_US
dc.subjectSoutheast Asiaen_US
dc.subjectInputsen_US
dc.subjectProcessesen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.titleInclusive schooling in Southeast Asian countries: a scoping review of the literatureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.source.journaltitleAsia Pacific Education Reviewen_US
dc.source.volume21
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage99
dc.source.endpage119
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2021-07-14T20:27:31Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Plattsburghen_US
dc.description.departmentTeacher Educationen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Hosshan et al. - 2020 - Inclusive ...
Size:
909.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Main article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record