Beyond the eye: effect of guilt and redemption on hidden self-harm
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Bansal, SonakshiKeyword
Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::PsychologySelf-harm
Guilt
Redemption
Readers/Advisors
Geher, GlennHolmes, Tabitha
Wice, Matthew
Term and Year
Spring 2025Date Published
2025-05
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Self-harm is traditionally viewed as a physical manifestation. This study aims to broaden the scope of what constitutes self-harming behavior and the role that guilt, and redemption can play on it. The study explores non-traditional forms of self-harm, termed as culturally acceptable forms of self-harm, like over-working, procrastination, intentional absence of self-care etc. Specifically, it examines the role of guilt and redemption in motivating individuals to engage in aversive experiences (aversive sound). Participants underwent a guilt-inducing manipulation and were subsequently asked to listen to an unpleasant audio stimulus. It was hypothesized that (1) participants offered a chance for redemption would endure the aversive sound for a shorter duration than those not offered redemption, and (2) engaging in the aversive task would reduce feelings of guilt across all participants. Guilt was measured using the Guilt and Shame Questionnaire (GSQ-8) twice, before the guilt-inducing manipulation, and post the aversive audio phase. A t-test indicated that participants who were given a chance for redemption listened to the aversive audio for a significantly shorter duration than those who were not given a chance for redemption. An ANCOVA analysis, controlling for initial guilt scores showed a significant effect of condition on final guilt, with participants in both conditions reporting reduced guilt levels post-task, and those in the neutral condition reporting a greater reduction. These findings suggest that engaging in culturally acceptable aversive behaviors may serve a guilt-alleviating function, and that perceived opportunities for redemption may modulate the extent of such selfdirected harm.Accessibility Statement
If this SOAR repository item is not accessible to you (e.g. able to be used in the context of a disability), please email libraryaccessibility@newpaltz.eduCollections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International