Non-Analog Behaviour of Eastern African Herbivore Communities During the Last Glacial Period
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Journal title
Ecology LettersDate Published
2025-01
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Modern African ungulates navigate seasonal variation in resource availability through diet-switching (primarily mixed-feeders) and/or migrating (primarily grass grazers). These ecological generalizations are well-documented today, but the extent to which they apply to the non-analog ecosystems of the Pleistocene are unclear. Drawing from serially-sampled stable isotope measurements from 18 Kenyan large herbivore species from the Last Glacial Period (LGP), we evaluate how diet, diet-switching, and migration compare to observations from present-day settings. We find a higher grazing signal in most LGP species and a greater magnitude of diet-switching than in the present. Additionally, we find that the relationships between grass intake, migration, diet-switching, and body size during the LGP were unlike those observed today. This establishes a revised paleoecology of LGP herbivore communities and highlights that LGP herbivores were behaviorally non-analog. Our results imply that ecological observations from present-day settings offer an incomplete perspective of herbivore-environment interactions.Citation
O'Brien, K., Ashioya, L. and Faith, J.T. (2025), Non-Analog Behaviour of Eastern African Herbivore Communities During the Last Glacial Period. Ecology Letters, 28: e70041. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70041DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70041Description
This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: O'Brien, K., Ashioya, L. and Faith, J.T. (2025), Non-Analog Behaviour of Eastern African Herbivore Communities During the Last Glacial Period. Ecology Letters, 28: e70041. , which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70041]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.Accessibility Statement
Electronic Accessibility Statement: SUNY Oneonta is committed to providing equal access to college information by ensuring our digital content is accessible by everyone regardless of physical, sensory, or cognitive ability. This item has been checked by Adobe Acrobat Accessibility Check and remediated with the following result: [Remediation: Title, structure type/Hazard: no known hazards]. To request further accessibility remediation on this SOAR repository item for your specific needs, please contact openaccess@oneonta.edu.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.70041
Scopus Count
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International