Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGriep, Rosane Härter
dc.contributor.authorRotenberg, Lúcia
dc.contributor.authorLandsbergis, Paul
dc.contributor.authorVasconcellos-Silva, Paulo Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-06T16:40:27Z
dc.date.available2024-12-06T16:40:27Z
dc.date.issued2011-02
dc.identifier.citationGriep RH, Rotenberg L, Landsbergis P, Vasconcellos-Silva PR. Combined use of job stress models and self-rated health in nursing. Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Feb;45(1):145-52. English, Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011000100017. PMID: 21181053.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1518-8787
dc.identifier.pmid21181053
dc.identifier.pmid21181053
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/15953
dc.description.abstractTo identify combinations of two models of psychosocial stress at work among nursing teams and their associations with self-rated health.
dc.description.abstractThis was a cross-sectional study among workers at three public hospitals in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil (N = 1307). In 2006, a multidimensional questionnaire including two scales for measuring stress at work (demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models) was administered. Partial and complete (including social support at work) demand-control models were considered, along with partial and complete (including excessive commitment to work) effort-reward models. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals.
dc.description.abstractThe dimensions of both models were independently associated with self-rated health, with odds ratios between 1.70 and 3.37. The partial demand-control model was less associated with health (OR = 1.79; 95%CI 1.26;2.53) than was the partial effort-reward imbalance model (OR = 2.27; 95%CI 1.57;3.30). Incorporation of social support and excessive commitment to work increased the strength of the demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models, respectively. Increased strength of association was observed when the two partial models were combined.
dc.description.abstractThe results indicate that the effort-reward imbalance model performed better for this specific group and for the outcome evaluated, and that there was an advantage in using complete models or combinations of partial models.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.scielo.br/j/rsp/a/RfYfPk6cSFWBKnh5BQQMKmg/?lang=enen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleCombined use of job stress models and self-rated health in nursing.en_US
dc.title.alternativeUso combinado de modelos de estresse no trabalho e a saúde auto-referida na enfermagemen_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleRevista de saude publicaen_US
dc.source.volume45
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage145
dc.source.endpage52
dc.source.countryBrazil
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2024-12-06T16:40:29Z
html.description.abstractTo identify combinations of two models of psychosocial stress at work among nursing teams and their associations with self-rated health.
html.description.abstractThis was a cross-sectional study among workers at three public hospitals in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil (N = 1307). In 2006, a multidimensional questionnaire including two scales for measuring stress at work (demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models) was administered. Partial and complete (including social support at work) demand-control models were considered, along with partial and complete (including excessive commitment to work) effort-reward models. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals.
html.description.abstractThe dimensions of both models were independently associated with self-rated health, with odds ratios between 1.70 and 3.37. The partial demand-control model was less associated with health (OR = 1.79; 95%CI 1.26;2.53) than was the partial effort-reward imbalance model (OR = 2.27; 95%CI 1.57;3.30). Incorporation of social support and excessive commitment to work increased the strength of the demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models, respectively. Increased strength of association was observed when the two partial models were combined.
html.description.abstractThe results indicate that the effort-reward imbalance model performed better for this specific group and for the outcome evaluated, and that there was an advantage in using complete models or combinations of partial models.
dc.description.institutionSUNY Downstateen_US
dc.description.departmentEnvironmental and Occupational Health Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.journalRevista de saude publica
dc.identifier.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
englishdownload.pdf
Size:
118.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Article in English
Thumbnail
Name:
portugesedownload.pdf
Size:
154.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Article in Portuguese

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International