Unchanging visions: the effects and limitations of ocular stillness
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Journal title
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological SciencesDate Published
2017-02-27Publication Volume
372Publication Issue
1718Publication Begin page
20160204
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Scientists have pondered the perceptual effects of ocular motion, and those of its counterpart, ocular stillness, for over 200 years. The unremitting 'trembling of the eye' that occurs even during gaze fixation was first noted by Jurin in 1738. In 1794, Erasmus Darwin documented that gaze fixation produces perceptual fading, a phenomenon rediscovered in 1804 by Ignaz Paul Vital Troxler. Studies in the twentieth century established that Jurin's 'eye trembling' consisted of three main types of 'fixational' eye movements, now called microsaccades (or fixational saccades), drifts and tremor. Yet, owing to the constant and minute nature of these motions, the study of their perceptual and physiological consequences has met significant technological challenges. Studies starting in the 1950s and continuing in the present have attempted to study vision during retinal stabilization-a technique that consists on shifting any and all visual stimuli presented to the eye in such a way as to nullify all concurrent eye movements-providing a tantalizing glimpse of vision in the absence of change. No research to date has achieved perfect retinal stabilization, however, and so other work has devised substitute ways to counteract eye motion, such as by studying the perception of afterimages or of the entoptic images formed by retinal vessels, which are completely stable with respect to the eye. Yet other research has taken the alternative tack to control eye motion by behavioural instruction to fix one's gaze or to keep one's gaze still, during concurrent physiological and/or psychophysical measurements. Here, we review the existing data-from historical and contemporary studies that have aimed to nullify or minimize eye motion-on the perceptual and physiological consequences of perfect versus imperfect fixation. We also discuss the accuracy, quality and stability of ocular fixation, and the bottom-up and top-down influences that affect fixation behaviour.This article is part of the themed issue 'Movement suppression: brain mechanisms for stopping and stillness'.Citation
Martinez-Conde S, Macknik SL. Unchanging visions: the effects and limitations of ocular stillness. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 19;372(1718):20160204. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0204. PMID: 28242737; PMCID: PMC5332862.DOI
10.1098/rstb.2016.0204ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1098/rstb.2016.0204
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons