Imbalanced specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Mahoney, Mary T.Linkowski, Lauren C.
Mix, Michael D.
Wong, Roger
Sim, Austin J.
Hoffe, Sarah E.
Sura, Karna T.
Journal title
BMC Medical EducationDate Published
2024-09-09
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) is an examination series required for allopathic physician licensure in the United States (US). USMLE content is created and maintained by the National Board of Medical Examinations (NBME). The specialty composition of the USMLE and NBME taskforce members involved in the creation of examination content is currently unknown. Methods: Using the 2021 USMLE and 2021 NBME Committees and Task Forces documents, we determined each member's board-certified primary specialty and involvement in test material development committees who we dubbed "test writers". Total active physicians by primary specialty were recorded from the 2020 Physician Specialty Data Report published by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to analyze the cohorts. Results: The USMLE and NBME test writer primary specialty composition was found to be significantly different compared to the US active physician population (USMLE χ2 [32]=172, p<.001 and NBME χ2 [32]=200, p<.001). Only nineteen specialties were represented within USMLE test writers, with three specialties being proportionally represented. Two specialties were represented within NBME test writers. Obstetrics and Gynecology physicians were proportionally represented in USMLE but not within NBME test writers. Internal Medicine (IM) accounts for the largest percentage of all USMLE test writers (60/197, 30%) with an excess representation of 31 individuals. Conclusions: There is an imbalance in the specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers compared to the US active physician population. These findings may have implications for the unbiased and accurate portrayal of topics in such national examinations; thus, future investigation is warranted.Citation
Mahoney, M. T., Linkowski, L. C., Mix, M. D., Wong, R., Sim, A. J., Hoffe, S. E., & Sura, K. T. (2024). Imbalanced specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 980. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05976-0DOI
10.1186/s12909-024-05976-0ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s12909-024-05976-0
Scopus Count
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International