Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBass, Anne R.
dc.contributor.authorMehta, Bella
dc.contributor.authorSculco, Peter K.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yi
dc.contributor.authorDo, Huong T.
dc.contributor.authorGlaser, Katharine Kayla J.
dc.contributor.authorAude, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorCarli, Alberto V.
dc.contributor.authorFiggie, Mark P.
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Susan M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T15:23:07Z
dc.date.available2024-08-23T15:23:07Z
dc.date.issued2024-08
dc.identifier.citationBass AR, Mehta B, Sculco PK, Zhang Y, Do HT, Glaser KKJ, Aude C, Carli AV, Figgie MP, Goodman SM. Temporal Trends in the Rate of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection. Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 3;28:101442. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101442. PMID: 39071089; PMCID: PMC11283064.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2352-3441
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.artd.2024.101442
dc.identifier.pmid39071089
dc.identifier.piiS2352344124001274
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/15447
dc.description.abstractBackground: Perioperative practices have been introduced over the last decade to decrease the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to determine whether rates of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for PJI decreased during the period 2006-2016. Methods: This observational cohort study used data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System to identify patients undergoing TKA in 2006-2016. Data through 2017 were used to determine if patients underwent revision TKA for PJI (including debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) within 1 year of the primary surgery. A generalized estimating equation model, clustered by hospital, was used to examine the impact of time on likelihood of revision TKA for PJI. Results: In 2006-2016, 233,165 primary TKAs performed were included. Mean age was 66.1 (standard deviation 10.3) years, and 65% were women. Overall, 0.5% of the patients underwent revision TKA for PJI within 1 year of surgery. The generalized estimating equation model showed that for primary TKA performed in 2006-2013, year of surgery did not impact the likelihood of revision TKA for PJI (odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.03, P = .9221), but that for primary TKA performed in 2014-2016, the likelihood decreased by year (odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.88, P = .0002). Conclusions: The likelihood of revision TKA for PJI was stable from 2006 to 2013 but declined during the period 2014-2016 across patient and hospital categories. This decline could be due to infection mitigation strategies or other unmeasured factors.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.arthroplastytoday.org/article/S2352-3441(24)00127-4/fulltexten_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectknee replacementen_US
dc.subjectobservational studyen_US
dc.subjectprosthesis-related infectionsen_US
dc.subjectrevision surgeryen_US
dc.titleTemporal Trends in the Rate of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infectionen_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleArthroplasty Todayen_US
dc.source.volume28
dc.source.beginpage101442
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-23T15:23:08Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Downstateen_US
dc.description.departmentMedicineen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version
Thumbnail
Name:
PIIS2352344124001274.pdf
Size:
637.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record