Can integrating the theory of multiple intelligences and the use of sign language assist ell students academically and emotionally in the classroom?
Keyword
Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::EducationEarly childhood
Childhood education
Multiple intelligence
American Sign Language
English Language Learner
ESL
English as a Second Language
Research Subject Categories::HUMANITIES and RELIGION::Languages and linguistics::Sign language
Date Published
2020-05Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
English Language Learners have a difficult time learning a new language and having the extra support in a classroom can make all the difference in their education and self-esteem. As teachers in training, we know not all students are alike and because of that, we must differentiate our teaching to help students walk away with being confident in their education. Integrating the Theory of Multiple Intelligences by working to strengthen two or more intelligences can open numerous possibilities and opportunities for these students. Additionally, students who may or may not know sign language could benefit from using this form of communication to express themselves physically and emotionally in the classroom. Sign language has the ability to become the bridge that helps ELL students learn English. Through research, it has been found that sign language helps students learn new words and express themselves when English is not their native language.Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The Effects of an Intensive Language Development Program on the Expressive and Receptive Language of Kindergarten ChildrenThe purpose of this study was to examine the effect that an intensive program of language development had on the expressive and receptive language of kindergarten children. The design of this study was a one group pretest, posttest design. This study consisted of approximately twenty-five kindergarten children from a rural community. Each student was pretested individually using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (Form A), the Test of Language Development, and a taped, oral test developed by the researcher. At the conclusion of the instruction, each child was individually posttested using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (Form B), the Test of Language Development, and a taped, oral test developed by the researcher. A program of language development was extended over a period of six months from December to May. The program of language development was based on the Peabody Language Development Kit, Levels One and Two, and a language-experience approach based on the books An Experience-Based Approach to Language and Reading by Braun and Froese (1977) and Language Face to Face edited by Early (1971) A t test for Related Measures was employed to determine any significant differences between pretest and posttest scores of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and the Test of Language Development. The oral, taped, researcher-devised test was scored according to the syntactic analysis developed by Ekhtiar (1962) and used in studies of language by Strickland. A descriptive score was obtained from this analysis providing information regarding the basic patterns of structure which appear in the oral language of children and tha patterns of subordination and elaboration which are employed. From this study, findings indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in expressive language but that statistically significant differences existed in the area of receptive language and in a combination of expressive and receptive language. In the descriptive analysis, there was considerable difference in the pretest and posttest results. The most noticeable difference was on the first level of analysis which identified the patterns of stationary elements. Findings from the study showed that the children’s ability to understand and use their language had increased significantly while their skills of imitating speech had not been noticeably changed. From the results, it can be concluded that an intensive program of language development can make a significant difference on the receptive and on a combination of receptive and expressive language of kindergarten children.
-
Language, queerly phrased: a sociolinguistic examination of nonbinary gender identity in FrenchLanguage, a uniquely human skill, is intrinsic to the self. Beyond its base communication purpose, language serves to shape the identity of the speakers who use it. One of the biggest examples of language defining and confining interlocutors’ identities is the concept of gender. Based on a language’s use of gender, speakers of that language are confined to the gender rules set forth in grammatical systems. How then can people who do not identify as male or female be recognized as legitimate if the language they speak does not accommodate for their gender identity? This thesis aims to examine how gender variant people speak in gendered languages, first examining English, Hebrew and Japanese as case studies, then moving on to the historically rigid and regulated French. This study examines respondents’ proposed solutions to the French language’s lack of a non-gendered pronoun on social media to see if it is indeed possible for people to identify themselves and each other in a language that does not structurally recognize them as legitimate.
-
Using a modified cultural relevance rubric to assess and implement culturally relevant texts in content area classrooms for ELLs.Texts provided and utilized in many schools and classrooms are not always the most appropriate, relevant, or engaging for English language learners (ELLs) because ELLs’ backgrounds and schemata usually differ from those of their non-ELL counterparts (Ebe, 2010, 2011, 2012; Freeman, Freeman, & Freeman, 2003; Freeman & Freeman, 2004). ELLs who read culturally relevant texts (CRTs) are more likely to show an increase in reading comprehension scores (Ebe, 2010, 2011, 2012) and CRTs can lead to an increase in reading engagement (Freeman, Freeman, & Freeman, 2003). CRTs can be used in all content areas to enrich the learning of students. However, it can be difficult and time consuming to find CRTs that correlate with the curriculum topics and some teachers may not know how to determine if a text is culturally relevant. Therefore, this curriculum project focuses on identifying and utilizing both expository and literature CRTs across the content areas. Using these types of text in inclusive classrooms with non-ELLs and ELLs can help enrich all students by providing multiple viewpoints of an event and encouraging the use of critical thinking skills and questioning (Gay, 2010). This project was designed as a tool for both mainstream and ESL teachers. Included in the project are a variety of CRTs and lessons for each of the content areas. These CRTs address ELLs’ language/ethnic heritage backgrounds including Spanish, Russian, Arabic, and Chinese. The project is limited to secondary teachers that have students from these selected backgrounds in their classes.
