Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNizame, Fosiul A.
dc.contributor.authorUnicomb, Leanne
dc.contributor.authorLuby, Stephen P.
dc.contributor.authorArman, Shaila
dc.contributor.authorWinch, Peter J.
dc.contributor.authorNasreen, Sharifa
dc.contributor.authorHalder, Amal K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-17T18:01:46Z
dc.date.available2024-06-17T18:01:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-03
dc.identifier.citationNizame FA, Nasreen S, Halder AK, Arman S, Winch PJ, Unicomb L, Luby SP. Observed practices and perceived advantages of different hand cleansing agents in rural Bangladesh: ash, soil, and soap. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jun;92(6):1111-6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0378. Epub 2015 Apr 13. PMID: 25870425; PMCID: PMC4458811.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9637
dc.identifier.eissn1476-1645
dc.identifier.doi10.4269/ajtmh.14-0378
dc.identifier.pmid25870425
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/14961
dc.description.abstractBangladeshi communities have historically used ash and soil as handwashing agents. A structured observation study and qualitative interviews on the use of ash/soil and soap as handwashing agents were conducted in rural Bangladesh to help develop a handwashing promotion intervention. The observations were conducted among 1,000 randomly selected households from 36 districts. Fieldworkers observed people using ash/soil to wash their hand(s) on 13% of occasions after defecation and on 10% after cleaning a child's anus. This compares with 19% of people who used soap after defecation and 27% after cleaning a child who defecated. Using ash/soil or soap was rarely (< 1%) observed at other times recommended for handwashing. The qualitative study enrolled 24 households from three observation villages, where high usage of ash/soil for handwashing was detected. Most informants reported that ash/soil was used only for handwashing after fecal contact, and that ash/soil could clean hands as effectively as soap.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygieneen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ajtmh.org/view/journals/tpmd/92/6/article-p1111.xmlen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleObserved Practices and Perceived Advantages of Different Hand Cleansing Agents in Rural Bangladesh: Ash, Soil, and Soapen_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygieneen_US
dc.source.volume92
dc.source.issue6
dc.source.beginpage1111
dc.source.endpage1116
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2024-06-17T18:01:47Z
dc.description.institutionSUNY Downstateen_US
dc.description.departmentEpidemiology and Biostatisticsen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
tropmed-92-1111.pdf
Size:
189.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International