Observed Practices and Perceived Advantages of Different Hand Cleansing Agents in Rural Bangladesh: Ash, Soil, and Soap
dc.contributor.author | Nizame, Fosiul A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Unicomb, Leanne | |
dc.contributor.author | Luby, Stephen P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Arman, Shaila | |
dc.contributor.author | Winch, Peter J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nasreen, Sharifa | |
dc.contributor.author | Halder, Amal K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-17T18:01:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-17T18:01:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nizame FA, Nasreen S, Halder AK, Arman S, Winch PJ, Unicomb L, Luby SP. Observed practices and perceived advantages of different hand cleansing agents in rural Bangladesh: ash, soil, and soap. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jun;92(6):1111-6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0378. Epub 2015 Apr 13. PMID: 25870425; PMCID: PMC4458811. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0002-9637 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1476-1645 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0378 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 25870425 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/14961 | |
dc.description.abstract | Bangladeshi communities have historically used ash and soil as handwashing agents. A structured observation study and qualitative interviews on the use of ash/soil and soap as handwashing agents were conducted in rural Bangladesh to help develop a handwashing promotion intervention. The observations were conducted among 1,000 randomly selected households from 36 districts. Fieldworkers observed people using ash/soil to wash their hand(s) on 13% of occasions after defecation and on 10% after cleaning a child's anus. This compares with 19% of people who used soap after defecation and 27% after cleaning a child who defecated. Using ash/soil or soap was rarely (< 1%) observed at other times recommended for handwashing. The qualitative study enrolled 24 households from three observation villages, where high usage of ash/soil for handwashing was detected. Most informants reported that ash/soil was used only for handwashing after fecal contact, and that ash/soil could clean hands as effectively as soap. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | en_US |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ajtmh.org/view/journals/tpmd/92/6/article-p1111.xml | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | Observed Practices and Perceived Advantages of Different Hand Cleansing Agents in Rural Bangladesh: Ash, Soil, and Soap | en_US |
dc.type | Article/Review | en_US |
dc.source.journaltitle | The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 92 | |
dc.source.issue | 6 | |
dc.source.beginpage | 1111 | |
dc.source.endpage | 1116 | |
dc.description.version | VoR | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-06-17T18:01:47Z | |
dc.description.institution | SUNY Downstate | en_US |
dc.description.department | Epidemiology and Biostatistics | en_US |
dc.description.degreelevel | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |