Barriers to universal prenatal HIV testing in 4 US locations in 1997
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Journal title
American Journal of Public HealthDate Published
2001-05-01Publication Volume
91Publication Issue
5Publication Begin page
727Publication End page
733
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objectives: We determined rates of prenatal HIV testing and investigated barriers to testing. Methods: We surveyed 1362 representative parturient women from 7 hospitals in 4 locations of the United States. Results: Overall, 89.9% of women reported being offered HIV testing and 69.6% reported being tested. Proportions of women not offered testing differed by location (range = 5.2%-16.3%), as did proportions not tested (range = 12.2%-54.4%). Among women who perceived that their clinicians had not recommended testing, 41.7% were tested, compared with 92.8% of women who perceived a strong recommendation (P < .05). Private insurance for prenatal care was also associated with not being tested. Women gave multiple reasons for not being tested, most commonly not being at risk, having been tested recently, and the test's not being offered or recommended, cited by 55.3%, 39.1% and 11.1% of women, respectively. Conclusions: Although most parturient women were offered a prenatal HIV test and got tested, testing proportions did not reach national goals and differed significantly by location and payment status. Concern about testing consequences was not a major barrier. Perception of clinicians' recommendations strongly influenced testing. Changing provider practices will be essential to implementing universal prenatal HIV testing.Citation
Royce RA, Walter EB, Fernandez MI, Wilson TE, Ickovics JR, Simonds RJ; Perinatal Guidelines Evaluation Project. Barriers to universal prenatal HIV testing in 4 US locations in 1997. Am J Public Health. 2001 May;91(5):727-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.5.727. PMID: 11344880; PMCID: PMC1446691.DOI
10.2105/ajph.91.5.727ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2105/ajph.91.5.727
Scopus Count
Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Related articles
- Achieving universal HIV screening in prenatal care in the United States: provider persistence pays off.
- Authors: Anderson JE, Koenig LJ, Lampe MA, Wright R, Leiss J, Saul J
- Issue date: 2005 Apr
- Prenatal HIV testing in Ontario: knowledge, attitudes and practices of prenatal care providers in a province with low testing rates.
- Authors: Guenter D, Carroll J, Kaczorowski J, Sellors J
- Issue date: 2003 Mar-Apr
- Legal barriers to implementing recommendations for universal, routine prenatal HIV testing.
- Authors: Wolf LE, Lo B, Gostin LO
- Issue date: 2004 Spring
- HIV testing: the boundaries. A survey of HIV testing practices and barriers to more widespread testing in a British teaching hospital.
- Authors: Partridge DG, Collini P, McKendrick MW
- Issue date: 2009 Jun
- Evidence-based guidelines for universal counselling and offering of HIV testing in pregnancy in Canada.
- Authors: Samson L, King S
- Issue date: 1998 Jun 2