Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
AuthorMugavero, Michael J
Westfall, Andrew O
Gardner, Lytt I
Keruly, Jeanne C
Wilson, Tracey E
Giordano, Thomas P
Journal titleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)
Publication Begin page574
Publication End page80
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: Measuring retention in HIV primary care is complex, as care includes multiple visits scheduled at varying intervals over time. We evaluated 6 commonly used retention measures in predicting viral load (VL) suppression and the correlation among measures.
Methods: Clinic-wide patient-level data from 6 academic HIV clinics were used for 12 months preceding implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Health Resources and Services Administration (CDC/HRSA) retention in care intervention. Six retention measures were calculated for each patient based on scheduled primary HIV provider visits: count and dichotomous missed visits, visit adherence, 6-month gap, 4-month visit constancy, and the HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau (HRSA HAB) retention measure. Spearman correlation coefficients and separate unadjusted logistic regression models compared retention measures with one another and with 12-month VL suppression, respectively. The discriminatory capacity of each measure was assessed with the c-statistic.
Results: Among 10,053 patients, 8235 (82%) had 12-month VL measures, with 6304 (77%) achieving suppression (VL <400 copies/mL). All 6 retention measures were significantly associated (P < 0.0001) with VL suppression (odds ratio; 95% CI, c-statistic): missed visit count (0.73; 0.71 to 0.75, 0.67), missed visit dichotomous (3.2; 2.8 to 3.6, 0.62), visit adherence (3.9; 3.5 to 4.3,0.69), gap (3.0; 2.6 to 3.3, 0.61), visit constancy (2.8; 2.5 to 3.0, 0.63), and HRSA HAB (3.8; 3.3 to 4.4, 0.59). Measures incorporating "no-show" visits were highly correlated (Spearman coefficient = 0.83-0.85), as were measures based solely on kept visits (Spearman coefficient = 0.72-0.77). Correlation coefficients were lower across these 2 groups of measures (range = 0.16-0.57).
Conclusions: Six retention measures displayed a wide range of correlation with one another, yet each measure had significant association and modest discrimination for VL suppression. These data suggest there is no clear gold standard and that selection of a retention measure may be tailored to context.
CitationMugavero MJ, Westfall AO, Zinski A, Davila J, Drainoni ML, Gardner LI, Keruly JC, Malitz F, Marks G, Metsch L, Wilson TE, Giordano TP; Retention in Care (RIC) Study Group. Measuring retention in HIV care: the elusive gold standard. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012 Dec 15;61(5):574-80. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318273762f. PMID: 23011397; PMCID: PMC3508092.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
- Retention in care is more strongly associated with viral suppression in HIV-infected patients with lower versus higher CD4 counts.
- Authors: Yehia BR, French B, Fleishman JA, Metlay JP, Berry SA, Korthuis PT, Agwu AL, Gebo KA, HIV Research Network
- Issue date: 2014 Mar 1
- From access to engagement: measuring retention in outpatient HIV clinical care.
- Authors: Mugavero MJ, Davila JA, Nevin CR, Giordano TP
- Issue date: 2010 Oct
- Early retention in HIV care and viral load suppression: implications for a test and treat approach to HIV prevention.
- Authors: Mugavero MJ, Amico KR, Westfall AO, Crane HM, Zinski A, Willig JH, Dombrowski JC, Norton WE, Raper JL, Kitahata MM, Saag MS
- Issue date: 2012 Jan 1
- Ryan White HIV/AIDS program recipients more likely than non-recipients to be retained in care using six different retention measures.
- Authors: Kay ES, Westfall AO
- Issue date: 2020 Jan
- High retention in HIV care at a tertiary care centre in Toronto, Canada.
- Authors: Szadkowski L, Walmsley S, Burchell AN, Collins E, Rourke SB, Raboud J, OHTN Cohort Study Team
- Issue date: 2018 Feb