• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • University Colleges
    • Purchase College
    • Purchase College Student Projects
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • University Colleges
    • Purchase College
    • Purchase College Student Projects
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of SUNY Open Access RepositoryCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDepartmentAuthor ProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Campus Communities in SOAR

    Alfred State CollegeBrockportBroomeCantonDownstateDutchessEmpireFarmingdaleFinger LakesFredoniaHerkimerMaritimeNew PaltzNiagaraOld WestburyOneontaOnondagaOptometryOswegoPlattsburghPurchase CollegePolytechnic InstituteSUNY Office of Workforce Development and Upward MobilitySUNY PressUpstate Medical

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Is the U.S. Electoral College Undemocratic?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    4225_paul.fiore.pdf
    Size:
    413.2Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Author
    FIORE, Paul
    Keyword
    First Reader Ursula Heinrich
    Capstone Paper
    Semester Spring 2020
    Readers/Advisors
    Heinrich, Ursula
    Term and Year
    Spring 2020
    Date Published
    2020
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/13711
    Abstract
    Abstract Background:  Until it supplants the popular vote, few in the public notice or think about the U.S. Electoral College and its role in electing the president.  While it had backfired just a few times in the 19th Century, having the Electoral College overturn the popular vote twice in the 21st Century rendered the institution indefensible.  This study explored how we got stuck with this system and how we might revise or eliminate it for direct, popular election of the president. Objective:  This study explored why this system was implemented by the Founding Fathers at the 1787 Constitutional Convention and why such an undemocratic method of choosing the president is in use to this day. Design and Method:  In a survey of relevant peer-reviewed articles found through the SUNY Purchase Library Database, most of the researchers were in favor of eliminating or modifying the Electoral College.  Just three of the researchers were in favor of its retention.  The opinions of both sides of this topic were synthesized and evaluated in terms of adequately supporting their respective positions on the Electoral College. Results:  Eight of the eleven researchers found that the Electoral College was certainly undemocratic.  Several of the eight proposed ways of modifying it to better represent the will of the voter without amending the Constitution.  In these remarkably partisan times, this seems a better course of action but might also not result in any substantial change to the allocation of electors from our current winner-take-all system, which is in use in 49 of the 51 election ‘units,’ as the states and District of Columbia are known, to create a form of proportional representation. Conclusion:  While partisan politics has clouded the dream of democratic representation, some states have initiated the Electoral College National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.  Once the equivalent of 270 Electoral College votes have been reached by additional states joining this agreement, all member states will award their Electoral College votes to the popular vote winner.  In lieu of a Constitutional amendment to eliminate the Electoral College or state-by-state adaptation of proportional selection of the Electoral College Electors, the Interstate Compact would be the winning, democratic compromise that would be permitted by the Constitution.  Keywords:  Political Science, Presidential Elections, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Electoral College, U.S. Presidential Electoral College
    Accessibility Statement
    Purchase College - State University of New York (PC) is committed to ensuring that people with disabilities have an opportunity equal to that of their nondisabled peers to participate in the College's programs, benefits, and services, including those delivered through electronic and information technology. If you encounter an access barrier with a specific item and have a remediation request, please contact lib.ir@purchase.edu.
    Collections
    Purchase College Student Projects

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2025)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.