The Effects of Musical Training of Successful Communication of Emotion
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Johannes, MayaReaders/Advisors
Curtis, Meagan E.Term and Year
Spring 2020Date Published
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In music and speech, different combinations of tempo, intensity, and pitch can work together to express a wide variety of different emotions (Curtis & Bharucha, 2010; Juslin & Laukka, 2003). Due to the shared communicative code across these two domains, researchers have been interested in whether musical training enhances one’s ability to comprehend emotion in speech. Previous research has primarily examined musicians as decoders of vocally-expressed emotion, testing their performance on tasks measuring their ability to accurately identify emotional expressions in comparison to their nonmusician counterparts. The current project tested whether musicians are better encoders of emotion than nonmusicians, examining their ability to produce vocalizations that successfully communicate the intended emotion. It also tested whether musicianship confers a decoding advantage when attempting to identify emotions in the voices of others. To test this, emotional speech samples from five musicians and four nonmusicians were recorded under carefully-controlled conditions. These recordings were then played for 8 additional participants—half musicians and half nonmusicians—who served as raters and were asked, in a four-alternative-choice task, to identify the emotion they heard in each speech sample. Results indicated no significant differences in the overall encoding success between musicians and nonmusicians. However, there was a marginally significant decoding benefit for raters who had musical training. The decoding success of raters who had musical training was 80.8%, whereas the nonmusician raters achieved 67.4% decoding success. It is unknown whether the sample size was too small to observe a similar benefit of musicianship at encoding or if the musician advantage is truly restricted to the decoding stage of communication.Collections