Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Hoffman, MariahReaders/Advisors
Fabian, Rachel C.Term and Year
Spring 2020Date Published
2020
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
What constitutes a psychological thriller, and the key developments in film production and reception that have encouraged this category of filmmaking to emerge, has been the subject of much debate within Cinema Studies. This project details the ways in which the psychological thriller in many ways exceeds conventional notions of genre and auteur cinema. Furthermore, it argues that examining films made during the 1990s offers an especially rich ground for expanding the definitions of the psychological thriller to account for critical reception in an internet age. I am interested in how films that get referred to as psychological thrillers in the 1990s became characterized as such through their positioning as “indies” and by the high level “buzz” they generated among critics and preview audiences, which encouraged audiences to engage in multiple viewings of these films both in theaters and at home. While narrative and aesthetic devices have been a primary focus of scholars writing on these films, I am interested in how dynamics of reception equally contributed to the films’ mind-bending qualities. The significance of repetition at both the level of the text and in viewing of these films continues to be seen as a central characteristic of psychological thrillers today. I suggest that more recent films, namely Us (Jordan Peele, US, 2019) and Enemy (Denis Villeneuve, Canada and Spain, 2013), further elaborate these dynamics through their innovative use of doppelganger figures.Collections