Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilson, Tracey E
dc.contributor.authorHennessy, Emily A
dc.contributor.authorFalzon, Louise
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, Rebekah
dc.contributor.authorKronish, Ian M
dc.contributor.authorBirk, Jeffrey L
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-14T16:15:46Z
dc.date.available2023-07-14T16:15:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-13
dc.identifier.citationWilson TE, Hennessy EA, Falzon L, Boyd R, Kronish IM, Birk JL. Effectiveness of interventions targeting self-regulation to improve adherence to chronic disease medications: a meta-review of meta-analyses. Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;14(1):66-85. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1706615. Epub 2020 Jan 13. PMID: 31856664; PMCID: PMC7254887.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1743-7202
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17437199.2019.1706615
dc.identifier.pmid31856664
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/10487
dc.description.abstractAdherence to chronic disease medication regimens depends in part on successful self-regulation. However, the overall benefit of interventions targeting self-regulatory mechanisms is not well-understood. Accordingly, we conducted a meta-review of meta-analyses assessing the effect of interventions targeting self-regulation on medication adherence. For this meta-review, meta-analyses appearing between January 2006 and March 2019 were eligible if they included experimental trials that assessed the effect of an intervention targeting self-regulation on adherence to chronic disease medication. A systematic literature search of multiple databases for published and unpublished literature identified 16,001 abstracts. Twelve meta-analyses met eligibility criteria and had variable quality according to AMSTAR 2 item completion ( = 50%; range: 31-66%). Overall, meta-reviews showed small to medium effect sizes for interventions that targeted self-monitoring, provided personalised feedback on adherence, or involved complete self-management. Other interventions, such as goal setting, barrier identification and problem solving, and stress management showed little evidence of improving adherence. Only a limited number of self-regulation intervention components were able to be evaluated. Additional research is needed to advance the understanding of the efficacy of adherence interventions focussed on self-regulation by expanding the scope of self-regulation elements targeted (e.g., emotion regulation).
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17437199.2019.1706615?journalCode=rhpr20en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMeta-reviewen_US
dc.subjectbehavioural interventionen_US
dc.subjectchronic diseaseen_US
dc.subjectmedication adherenceen_US
dc.subjectself-regulationen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of interventions targeting self-regulation to improve adherence to chronic disease medications: a meta-review of meta-analyses.en_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleHealth psychology reviewen_US
dc.source.volume14
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage66
dc.source.endpage85
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.source.countryEngland
dc.description.versionAMen_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-07-14T16:15:47Z
html.description.abstractAdherence to chronic disease medication regimens depends in part on successful self-regulation. However, the overall benefit of interventions targeting self-regulatory mechanisms is not well-understood. Accordingly, we conducted a meta-review of meta-analyses assessing the effect of interventions targeting self-regulation on medication adherence. For this meta-review, meta-analyses appearing between January 2006 and March 2019 were eligible if they included experimental trials that assessed the effect of an intervention targeting self-regulation on adherence to chronic disease medication. A systematic literature search of multiple databases for published and unpublished literature identified 16,001 abstracts. Twelve meta-analyses met eligibility criteria and had variable quality according to AMSTAR 2 item completion ( = 50%; range: 31-66%). Overall, meta-reviews showed small to medium effect sizes for interventions that targeted self-monitoring, provided personalised feedback on adherence, or involved complete self-management. Other interventions, such as goal setting, barrier identification and problem solving, and stress management showed little evidence of improving adherence. Only a limited number of self-regulation intervention components were able to be evaluated. Additional research is needed to advance the understanding of the efficacy of adherence interventions focussed on self-regulation by expanding the scope of self-regulation elements targeted (e.g., emotion regulation).
dc.description.institutionSUNY Downstateen_US
dc.description.departmentInfectious Diseasesen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.journalHealth psychology review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
nihms-1547672.pdf
Size:
745.6Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International