Comparison of an industry-derived LCx Chlamydia pneumoniae PCR research kit to in-house assays performed in five laboratories.
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Chernesky, MaxSmieja, Marek
Schachter, Julius
Summersgill, James
Schindler, Laura
Solomon, Natalie
Campbell, Karen
Campbell, LeeAnn
Cappuccio, Alison
Gaydos, Charlotte
Chong, Sylvia
Moncada, Jeanne
Phillips, Jack
Jang, Dan
Wood, Billie Jo
Petrich, Astrid
Hammerschlag, Margaret
Cerney, Mike
Mahony, James
Journal title
Journal of clinical microbiologyDate Published
2002-07Publication Volume
40Publication Issue
7Publication Begin page
2357Publication End page
62
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In a multicenter comparison of PCR assays utilizing 120 quantitated samples of 16 Chlamydia pneumoniae isolates, an LCx research-use-only (RUO) PCR developed by Abbott Laboratories demonstrated 100% sensitivity on 48 samples with >1 copy of DNA per microl of specimen. The sensitivities of five in-house PCR assays ranged from 54 to 94% for the same samples. All six assays showed decreased sensitivities as the DNA copy numbers of the samples decreased. Overall, sensitivities ranged from 68% for the LCx PCR assay to 29% for one of the in-house tests. The LCx RUO PCR and three of the five in-house PCR tests reported no false positives with the 24 negative samples. Increasing the number of replicates tested increased the sensitivities of all of the assays, including the LCx PCR. The LCx RUO assay showed high reproducibility for a single technologist and between technologists, with a kappa agreement of 0.77. The within-center agreements of the five in-house PCR tests varied from 0.19 to 0.74 on two challenges of 60 specimens 1 month apart. The LCx C. pneumoniae RUO PCR shows excellent potential for use in clinical studies, which could enable standardization of results in the field.Citation
Chernesky M, Smieja M, Schachter J, Summersgill J, Schindler L, Solomon N, Campbell K, Campbell L, Cappuccio A, Gaydos C, Chong S, Moncada J, Phillips J, Jang D, Wood BJ, Petrich A, Hammerschlag M, Cerney M, Mahony J. Comparison of an industry-derived LCx Chlamydia pneumoniae PCR research kit to in-house assays performed in five laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Jul;40(7):2357-62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2357-2362.2002. PMID: 12089248; PMCID: PMC120594.Collections
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International