Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKutlin, A
dc.contributor.authorTsumura, N
dc.contributor.authorEmre, U
dc.contributor.authorRoblin, P M
dc.contributor.authorHammerschlag, M R
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-30T16:31:55Z
dc.date.available2023-06-30T16:31:55Z
dc.date.issued1997-03
dc.identifier.citationKutlin A, Tsumura N, Emre U, Roblin PM, Hammerschlag MR. Evaluation of Chlamydia immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgA rELISAs Medac for diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1997 Mar;4(2):213-6. doi: 10.1128/cdli.4.2.213-216.1997. PMID: 9067658; PMCID: PMC170504.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1071-412X
dc.identifier.pmid9067658
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/10342
dc.description.abstractChlamydia pneumoniae is an important pathogen responsible for a variety of respiratory diseases in humans. Cell culture remains the most specific method for C. pneumoniae diagnosis, but it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Thus, serology, particularly microimmunofluorescence (MIF) testing, is frequently utilized. However, the MIF test has a significant subjective component. We evaluated a new serological test: Chlamydia Immunoglobulin M (IgG, IgA, and IgM rELISAs Medac, based on a recombinant Chlamydia-specific lipopolysaccharide (LPS) fragment, for the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection. The results of this study demonstrated that the use of rELISAs Medac with single sera does not appear to be sensitive or specific for diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection compared to culture. In children, sensitivities of the rELISAs compared to culture did not exceed 34.2%, and the specificities ranged from 68.4% (IgG) to 91.2% (IgA). In adults, the sensitivities of the rELISAs were slightly higher, up to 77.8% (IgA or IgG), but the specificities ranged from a very low 20.8% for IgA or IgG to 81.1% for IgM. When multiple sera were tested, the results of the rELISAs Medac correlated with culture results in five of eight (62.5%) patients. However, this offers only a retrospective diagnosis, which makes it difficult to manage these patients prospectively.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/epdf/10.1128/cdli.4.2.213-216.1997en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleEvaluation of Chlamydia immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgA rELISAs Medac for diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection.en_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunologyen_US
dc.source.volume4
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage213
dc.source.endpage6
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-30T16:31:55Z
html.description.abstractChlamydia pneumoniae is an important pathogen responsible for a variety of respiratory diseases in humans. Cell culture remains the most specific method for C. pneumoniae diagnosis, but it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Thus, serology, particularly microimmunofluorescence (MIF) testing, is frequently utilized. However, the MIF test has a significant subjective component. We evaluated a new serological test: Chlamydia Immunoglobulin M (IgG, IgA, and IgM rELISAs Medac, based on a recombinant Chlamydia-specific lipopolysaccharide (LPS) fragment, for the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection. The results of this study demonstrated that the use of rELISAs Medac with single sera does not appear to be sensitive or specific for diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection compared to culture. In children, sensitivities of the rELISAs compared to culture did not exceed 34.2%, and the specificities ranged from 68.4% (IgG) to 91.2% (IgA). In adults, the sensitivities of the rELISAs were slightly higher, up to 77.8% (IgA or IgG), but the specificities ranged from a very low 20.8% for IgA or IgG to 81.1% for IgM. When multiple sera were tested, the results of the rELISAs Medac correlated with culture results in five of eight (62.5%) patients. However, this offers only a retrospective diagnosis, which makes it difficult to manage these patients prospectively.
dc.description.institutionSUNY Downstateen_US
dc.description.departmentPediatricsen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.journalClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology
dc.identifier.issue2en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
cdli.4.2.213-216.1997.pdf
Size:
61.22Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International